BNL
Price
$15.88
Change
+$0.04 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.95B
3 days until earnings call
FBASF
Price
$1.47
Change
+$0.01 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNL vs FBASF

Header iconBNL vs FBASF Comparison
Open Charts BNL vs FBASFBanner chart's image
Broadstone Net Lease
Price$15.88
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
Volume$661.17K
Capitalization2.95B
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.68%)
Volume$387
Capitalization5.74B
BNL vs FBASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNL vs. FBASF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNL is a Hold and FBASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BNL: $15.84 vs. FBASF: $1.47)
Brand notoriety: BNL and FBASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNL: 0% vs. FBASF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BNL: $2.95B vs. FBASF: $5.74B
BNL [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.95B. FBASF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $5.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBASF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBASF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNL and FBASF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBASF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FBASF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBASF is a better buy in the short-term than BNL.

Price Growth

BNL (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while FBASF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.93% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBASF($5.74B) has a higher market cap than BNL($2.95B). BNL has higher P/E ratio than FBASF: BNL (18.64) vs FBASF (3.47). FBASF YTD gains are higher at: 47.000 vs. BNL (3.467). FBASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. BNL (403M). FBASF has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. BNL (19.5M). BNL has less debt than FBASF: BNL (1.91B) vs FBASF (128B). FBASF has higher revenues than BNL: FBASF (24.6B) vs BNL (443M).
BNLFBASFBNL / FBASF
Capitalization2.95B5.74B51%
EBITDA403M39.1B1%
Gain YTD3.46747.0007%
P/E Ratio18.643.47538%
Revenue443M24.6B2%
Total Cash19.5M3.51B1%
Total Debt1.91B128B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBASF: Fundamental Ratings
FBASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNLFBASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEXX17.570.17
+1.00%
Direxion Dly MSCI Mexico Bull 3X ShsETF
ADX22.200.19
+0.86%
Adams Diversified Equity Fund
SMCO26.660.20
+0.75%
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
KBWD14.260.03
+0.21%
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF
APOC25.65N/A
N/A
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prt ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct

BNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNL has been closely correlated with EPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNL jumps, then EPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNL
1D Price
Change %
BNL100%
N/A
EPR - BNL
76%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
VICI - BNL
74%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
EPRT - BNL
74%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
LXP - BNL
72%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
GLPI - BNL
72%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
More

FBASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBASF and HHDS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBASF and HHDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBASF
1D Price
Change %
FBASF100%
+0.68%
HHDS - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATTRF - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQFT - FBASF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.74%
BNL - FBASF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRDEF - FBASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More