BNKHF
Price
$4.45
Change
-$0.25 (-5.32%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
49.91B
MDIBF
Price
$23.59
Change
+$0.54 (+2.34%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
17.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNKHF vs MDIBF

Header iconBNKHF vs MDIBF Comparison
Open Charts BNKHF vs MDIBFBanner chart's image
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings)
Price$4.45
Change-$0.25 (-5.32%)
Volume$707
Capitalization49.91B
MedioBanca SpA
Price$23.59
Change+$0.54 (+2.34%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization17.95B
BNKHF vs MDIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNKHF vs. MDIBF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNKHF is a Hold and MDIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BNKHF: $4.45 vs. MDIBF: $23.59)
Brand notoriety: BNKHF and MDIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNKHF: 22% vs. MDIBF: 295%
Market capitalization -- BNKHF: $49.91B vs. MDIBF: $17.95B
BNKHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $49.91B. MDIBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNKHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDIBF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MDIBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDIBF is a better buy in the long-term than BNKHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNKHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDIBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNKHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MDIBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNKHF is a better buy in the short-term than MDIBF.

Price Growth

BNKHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.25% price change this week, while MDIBF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNKHF($49.9B) has a higher market cap than MDIBF($17.9B). MDIBF has higher P/E ratio than BNKHF: MDIBF (12.25) vs BNKHF (9.07). MDIBF YTD gains are higher at: 47.931 vs. BNKHF (41.270). MDIBF has less debt than BNKHF: MDIBF (34.2B) vs BNKHF (87.8B). BNKHF has higher revenues than MDIBF: BNKHF (82.3B) vs MDIBF (3.37B).
BNKHFMDIBFBNKHF / MDIBF
Capitalization49.9B17.9B279%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.27047.93186%
P/E Ratio9.0712.2574%
Revenue82.3B3.37B2,446%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt87.8B34.2B257%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNKHF vs MDIBF: Fundamental Ratings
BNKHF
MDIBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9237
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5612
SMR RATING
1..100
210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1720
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDIBF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNKHF (85). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNKHF (56). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBF (10). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (50). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBF (20). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNKHFMDIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASPN7.100.23
+3.35%
Aspen Aerogels
SEED1.120.02
+2.16%
Origin Agritech Limited
KEP12.990.05
+0.39%
Korea Electric Power Corp
SUPN47.03-0.15
-0.32%
Supernus Pharmaceuticals
VSME2.50-0.48
-16.11%
VS Media Holdings Limited

BNKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNKHF and KBCSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNKHF and KBCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNKHF
1D Price
Change %
BNKHF100%
N/A
KBCSF - BNKHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBGY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
LSFG - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
MDIBF - BNKHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MDIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBF has been loosely correlated with LSFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBF jumps, then LSFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBF
1D Price
Change %
MDIBF100%
N/A
LSFG - MDIBF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNKHF - MDIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPHLF - MDIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBK - MDIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVKEF - MDIBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More