BNKHF
Price
$4.66
Change
-$0.14 (-2.92%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.52B
LSFG
Price
$48.50
Change
+$2.35 (+5.09%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
49.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNKHF vs LSFG

Header iconBNKHF vs LSFG Comparison
Open Charts BNKHF vs LSFGBanner chart's image
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings)
Price$4.66
Change-$0.14 (-2.92%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization50.52B
Lifestore Financial Group
Price$48.50
Change+$2.35 (+5.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization49.98M
BNKHF vs LSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNKHF vs. LSFG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNKHF is a Hold and LSFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BNKHF: $4.66 vs. LSFG: $48.50)
Brand notoriety: BNKHF and LSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNKHF: 47% vs. LSFG: 52%
Market capitalization -- BNKHF: $50.52B vs. LSFG: $49.98M
BNKHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.52B. LSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNKHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNKHF is a better buy in the long-term than LSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNKHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNKHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSFG is a better buy in the short-term than BNKHF.

Price Growth

BNKHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNKHF($50.5B) has a higher market cap than LSFG($50M). LSFG (9.96) and BNKHF (9.53) have similar P/E ratio . BNKHF YTD gains are higher at: 47.937 vs. LSFG (9.605).
BNKHFLSFGBNKHF / LSFG
Capitalization50.5B50M101,000%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.9379.605499%
P/E Ratio9.539.9696%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A49.8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNKHF vs LSFG: Fundamental Ratings
BNKHF
LSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
3100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1616
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSFG's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNKHF (85). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSFG (100). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LSFG (100). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew significantly faster than LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (52). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (16). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNKHFLSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ED98.050.25
+0.26%
Consolidated Edison
WLAC10.28N/A
N/A
Willow Lane Acquisition Corp
GBDC14.75-0.04
-0.27%
Golub Capital BDC
MCB79.47-0.54
-0.67%
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp
MGIH1.59-0.55
-25.70%
Millennium Group International Holdings Limited

BNKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNKHF and KBCSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNKHF and KBCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNKHF
1D Price
Change %
BNKHF100%
N/A
KBCSF - BNKHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBGY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
LSFG - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
MDIBF - BNKHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSFG has been loosely correlated with MDIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSFG jumps, then MDIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSFG
1D Price
Change %
LSFG100%
N/A
MDIBF - LSFG
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MCHB - LSFG
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
JPHLF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - LSFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More