BNKHF
Price
$4.65
Change
+$0.29 (+6.65%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
32.14B
CIBEY
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.01 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNKHF vs CIBEY

Header iconBNKHF vs CIBEY Comparison
Open Charts BNKHF vs CIBEYBanner chart's image
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings)
Price$4.65
Change+$0.29 (+6.65%)
Volume$535
Capitalization32.14B
Commercial International Bank
Price$1.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.58%)
Volume$18.29K
Capitalization4.87B
BNKHF vs CIBEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNKHF vs. CIBEY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNKHF is a Buy and CIBEY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BNKHF: $4.65 vs. CIBEY: $1.70)
Brand notoriety: BNKHF and CIBEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNKHF: 31% vs. CIBEY: 175%
Market capitalization -- BNKHF: $32.14B vs. CIBEY: $4.87B
BNKHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $32.14B. CIBEY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNKHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCIBEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CIBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNKHF is a better buy in the long-term than CIBEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNKHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIBEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNKHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CIBEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIBEY is a better buy in the short-term than BNKHF.

Price Growth

BNKHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIBEY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNKHF($32.1B) has a higher market cap than CIBEY($4.87B). BNKHF has higher P/E ratio than CIBEY: BNKHF (8.75) vs CIBEY (5.67). BNKHF YTD gains are higher at: 47.611 vs. CIBEY (24.183). BNKHF has less debt than CIBEY: BNKHF (4.94B) vs CIBEY (14.2B). BNKHF has higher revenues than CIBEY: BNKHF (66.4B) vs CIBEY (47.6B).
BNKHFCIBEYBNKHF / CIBEY
Capitalization32.1B4.87B659%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.61124.183197%
P/E Ratio8.755.67154%
Revenue66.4B47.6B139%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.94B14.2B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNKHF vs CIBEY: Fundamental Ratings
BNKHF
CIBEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2890
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNKHF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (100). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIBEY (100). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CIBEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (2). This means that CIBEY’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (46). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIBEY (90). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNKHFCIBEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHTR416.974.71
+1.14%
Charter Communications
PRZO1.330.01
+0.76%
ParaZero Technologies Ltd
EGAN6.76-0.03
-0.44%
eGain Corp
GHRS14.91-0.11
-0.77%
GH Research PLC
DFH26.12-0.72
-2.68%
Dream Finders Homes

BNKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNKHF and KBCSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNKHF and KBCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNKHF
1D Price
Change %
BNKHF100%
N/A
KBCSF - BNKHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBGY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
LSFG - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
MDIBF - BNKHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBEY and BNKHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBEY and BNKHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBEY
1D Price
Change %
CIBEY100%
-0.58%
BNKHF - CIBEY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - CIBEY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGF - CIBEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CIBEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMBF - CIBEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More