It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFIVE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNED’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIVE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BNED (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while FIVE (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.21%.
BNED is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2024.
FIVE is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
BNED | FIVE | BNED / FIVE | |
Capitalization | 38.5M | 10B | 0% |
EBITDA | 2.09M | 516M | 0% |
Gain YTD | -93.409 | -60.354 | 155% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.06 | - |
Revenue | 1.57B | 3.56B | 44% |
Total Cash | 8.12M | 460M | 2% |
Total Debt | 535M | 1.74B | 31% |
BNED | FIVE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BNED's Valuation (40) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIVE (74) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that BNED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIVE’s over the last 12 months.
BNED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FIVE (100) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that BNED’s stock grew similarly to FIVE’s over the last 12 months.
FIVE's SMR Rating (47) in the Discount Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNED (98) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FIVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNED’s over the last 12 months.
BNED's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FIVE (64) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that BNED’s stock grew similarly to FIVE’s over the last 12 months.
FIVE's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as BNED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FIVE’s stock grew similarly to BNED’s over the last 12 months.
BNED | FIVE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago85% | 2 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 4 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNED has been closely correlated with NAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNED jumps, then NAAS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNED | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BNED | 100% | -4.94% | ||
NAAS - BNED | 88% Closely correlated | +9.49% | ||
CASY - BNED | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
IHCPF - BNED | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
MUSA - BNED | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
FIVE - BNED | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FIVE and FLWS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIVE and FLWS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FIVE | 100% | +1.50% | ||
FLWS - FIVE | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.95% | ||
ULTA - FIVE | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
WSM - FIVE | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
SBH - FIVE | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
WINA - FIVE | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
More |