BNDSF
Price
$3.63
Change
+$0.10 (+2.83%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.7B
FANDF
Price
$4.21
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNDSF vs FANDF

Header iconBNDSF vs FANDF Comparison
Open Charts BNDSF vs FANDFBanner chart's image
Banco De Sabadell SA
Price$3.63
Change+$0.10 (+2.83%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization6.7B
Firstrand
Price$4.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$146
Capitalization23.1B
BNDSF vs FANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNDSF vs. FANDF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNDSF is a StrongBuy and FANDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BNDSF: $3.63 vs. FANDF: $4.22)
Brand notoriety: BNDSF and FANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNDSF: 89% vs. FANDF: 6%
Market capitalization -- BNDSF: $6.7B vs. FANDF: $23.1B
BNDSF [@Major Banks] is valued at $6.7B. FANDF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $23.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNDSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNDSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNDSF is a better buy in the long-term than FANDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNDSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNDSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FANDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BNDSF and FANDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BNDSF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while FANDF (@Major Banks) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.63% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANDF($23.1B) has a higher market cap than BNDSF($6.7B). FANDF has higher P/E ratio than BNDSF: FANDF (11.12) vs BNDSF (6.30). BNDSF YTD gains are higher at: 86.154 vs. FANDF (5.375). FANDF has less debt than BNDSF: FANDF (20.4B) vs BNDSF (26.3B). FANDF has higher revenues than BNDSF: FANDF (123B) vs BNDSF (5.94B).
BNDSFFANDFBNDSF / FANDF
Capitalization6.7B23.1B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD86.1545.3751,603%
P/E Ratio6.3011.1257%
Revenue5.94B123B5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.3B20.4B129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNDSF vs FANDF: Fundamental Ratings
BNDSF
FANDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
539
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNDSF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (92). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (39). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

FANDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSF (6). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (53). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (71). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNDSFFANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOUG3.030.31
+11.40%
Douglas Elliman
EBR7.01N/A
N/A
Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras SA- Eletrobras
CRNX30.41N/A
N/A
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals
SIBN17.25-0.11
-0.63%
SI-BONE
WINT0.98-0.04
-3.92%
Windtree Therapeutics Inc.

BNDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNDSF and CICHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNDSF and CICHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNDSF
1D Price
Change %
BNDSF100%
N/A
CICHF - BNDSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
CICHY - BNDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
FANDF - BNDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBAUF - BNDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
CMWAY - BNDSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and BACHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and BACHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
BACHY - FANDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
FANDY - FANDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMWAY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
CICHY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
BNDSY - FANDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More