BNDSF
Price
$3.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.7B
CMWAY
Price
$116.68
Change
-$1.51 (-1.28%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
118.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNDSF vs CMWAY

Header iconBNDSF vs CMWAY Comparison
Open Charts BNDSF vs CMWAYBanner chart's image
Banco De Sabadell SA
Price$3.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.62K
Capitalization6.7B
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Price$116.68
Change-$1.51 (-1.28%)
Volume$62.24K
Capitalization118.93B
BNDSF vs CMWAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNDSF vs. CMWAY commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNDSF is a Hold and CMWAY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BNDSF: $3.20 vs. CMWAY: $116.68)
Brand notoriety: BNDSF and CMWAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNDSF: 47% vs. CMWAY: 53%
Market capitalization -- BNDSF: $6.7B vs. CMWAY: $118.93B
BNDSF [@Major Banks] is valued at $6.7B. CMWAY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $118.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNDSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMWAY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNDSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMWAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNDSF is a better buy in the long-term than CMWAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMWAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMWAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BNDSF (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while CMWAY (@Major Banks) price change was -0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.25% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMWAY($119B) has a higher market cap than BNDSF($6.7B). CMWAY has higher P/E ratio than BNDSF: CMWAY (18.18) vs BNDSF (6.30). BNDSF YTD gains are higher at: 64.103 vs. CMWAY (23.748). BNDSF has less debt than CMWAY: BNDSF (26.3B) vs CMWAY (161B). CMWAY has higher revenues than BNDSF: CMWAY (25.8B) vs BNDSF (5.94B).
BNDSFCMWAYBNDSF / CMWAY
Capitalization6.7B119B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD64.10323.748270%
P/E Ratio6.3018.1835%
Revenue5.94B25.8B23%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.3B161B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNDSF vs CMWAY: Fundamental Ratings
BNDSF
CMWAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNDSF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMWAY (100). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSF (7). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew similarly to BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSF (7). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew similarly to BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CMWAY (41). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew similarly to CMWAY’s over the last 12 months.

CMWAY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNDSF (57). This means that CMWAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMWAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFXT7.940.11
+1.40%
Enerflex Ltd
CHWY41.670.46
+1.12%
Chewy
DORM124.55-3.69
-2.88%
Dorman Products
ACRS1.47-0.06
-3.92%
Aclaris Therapeutics
ROMA2.66-0.22
-7.64%
Roma Green Finance Limited

BNDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNDSF and CICHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNDSF and CICHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNDSF
1D Price
Change %
BNDSF100%
N/A
CICHF - BNDSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
CICHY - BNDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
FANDF - BNDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBAUF - BNDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
CMWAY - BNDSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
More

CMWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMWAY has been loosely correlated with NTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMWAY jumps, then NTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMWAY
1D Price
Change %
CMWAY100%
-1.28%
NTB - CMWAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
C - CMWAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
ING - CMWAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
BAC - CMWAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
BCS - CMWAY
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
More