BNCZF
Price
$14.70
Change
+$2.95 (+25.11%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.68B
SRNN
Price
$11.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs SRNN

Header iconBNCZF vs SRNN Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs SRNNBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$14.70
Change+$2.95 (+25.11%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization22.68B
Southern Banc Company, Inc. (The)
Price$11.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$670
Capitalization8.42M
BNCZF vs SRNN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. SRNN commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Buy and SRNN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $14.70 vs. SRNN: $11.05)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and SRNN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 635% vs. SRNN: 145%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $22.68B vs. SRNN: $8.42M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.68B. SRNN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSRNN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SRNN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than SRNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRNN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SRNN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the short-term than SRNN.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +25.11% price change this week, while SRNN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($22.7B) has a higher market cap than SRNN($8.42M). SRNN has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: SRNN (9.21) vs BNCZF (7.92). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 80.147 vs. SRNN (-19.636). BNCZF has higher revenues than SRNN: BNCZF (7.02B) vs SRNN (9.43M).
BNCZFSRNNBNCZF / SRNN
Capitalization22.7B8.42M269,596%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD80.147-19.636-408%
P/E Ratio7.929.2186%
Revenue7.02B9.43M74,449%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF vs SRNN: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
SRNN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4334
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
146
SMR RATING
1..100
879
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNCZF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNN (43). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNN (46). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRNN (79). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (61). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

SRNN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCZF (24). This means that SRNN’s stock grew similarly to BNCZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFSRNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRKR0.950.07
+7.76%
Marker Therapeutics
CLYM2.130.03
+1.43%
Climb Bio Inc
DAWN6.770.09
+1.35%
Day One Biopharmaceuticals
WSBC32.330.21
+0.65%
WesBanco
TROW103.470.26
+0.25%
T Rowe Price Group

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNCZF and UWHR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNCZF and UWHR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBKM - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
EXCH - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+10.02%
SRNN - BNCZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRNN and WTBFA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRNN and WTBFA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRNN
1D Price
Change %
SRNN100%
N/A
WTBFA - SRNN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXCH - SRNN
29%
Poorly correlated
+10.02%
BNCZF - SRNN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFCL - SRNN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTTW - SRNN
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More