BNCZF
Price
$16.87
Change
+$2.17 (+14.76%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
22.89B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSUN
Price
$40.33
Change
+$0.28 (+0.70%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs FSUN

Header iconBNCZF vs FSUN Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs FSUNBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$16.87
Change+$2.17 (+14.76%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization22.89B
FirstSun Capital Ban
Price$40.33
Change+$0.28 (+0.70%)
Volume$142.16K
Capitalization1.13B
BNCZF vs FSUN Comparison Chart in %
BNCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. FSUN commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a StrongBuy and FSUN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $16.87 vs. FSUN: $40.33)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and FSUN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 176% vs. FSUN: 92%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $22.89B vs. FSUN: $1.13B
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.89B. FSUN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $160.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FSUN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than FSUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSUN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSUN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUN is a better buy in the short-term than BNCZF.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +15.15% price change this week, while FSUN (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUN is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($22.9B) has a higher market cap than FSUN($1.13B). FSUN has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: FSUN (11.63) vs BNCZF (10.34). BNCZF (7.452) and FSUN (7.161) have similar YTD gains . FSUN has less debt than BNCZF: FSUN (76.2M) vs BNCZF (30.2B). BNCZF has higher revenues than FSUN: BNCZF (7.02B) vs FSUN (398M).
BNCZFFSUNBNCZF / FSUN
Capitalization22.9B1.13B2,034%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.4527.161104%
P/E Ratio10.3411.6389%
Revenue7.02B398M1,764%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.2B76.2M39,633%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFFSUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERTH48.791.19
+2.50%
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
RHRX19.240.46
+2.46%
RH Tactical Rotation ETF
XLG58.311.02
+1.78%
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
JHLN24.720.03
+0.11%
JHancock Global Senior Loan ETF
DFCA50.550.01
+0.01%
Dimensional California Municipal Bd ETF

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More

FSUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUN has been loosely correlated with OSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUN jumps, then OSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUN
1D Price
Change %
FSUN100%
+0.70%
OSBC - FSUN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
ASB - FSUN
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
FMBH - FSUN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
LOB - FSUN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
SSB - FSUN
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
More