BNCZF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
23.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSUN
Price
$32.05
Change
-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
893.55M
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs FSUN

Header iconBNCZF vs FSUN Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs FSUNBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization23.11B
FirstSun Capital Ban
Price$32.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Volume$134.03K
Capitalization893.55M
BNCZF vs FSUN Comparison Chart in %
BNCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. FSUN commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Hold and FSUN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $14.20 vs. FSUN: $32.05)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and FSUN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 29% vs. FSUN: 79%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $23.11B vs. FSUN: $893.55M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.11B. FSUN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $893.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • FSUN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than FSUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSUN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FSUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the short-term than FSUN.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSUN (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUN is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($23.1B) has a higher market cap than FSUN($894M). FSUN has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: FSUN (10.14) vs BNCZF (7.75). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 74.020 vs. FSUN (-19.850). FSUN has less debt than BNCZF: FSUN (76.1M) vs BNCZF (30.2B). BNCZF has higher revenues than FSUN: BNCZF (7.02B) vs FSUN (389M).
BNCZFFSUNBNCZF / FSUN
Capitalization23.1B894M2,584%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD74.020-19.850-373%
P/E Ratio7.7510.1476%
Revenue7.02B389M1,805%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.2B76.1M39,685%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFFSUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGK82.270.48
+0.59%
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF
XTRE49.83-0.01
-0.02%
BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF
CCSO25.31-0.08
-0.31%
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF
IXP121.95-1.34
-1.09%
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
SMCX21.58-1.06
-4.68%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More

FSUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUN has been loosely correlated with HIFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUN jumps, then HIFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUN
1D Price
Change %
FSUN100%
-1.05%
HIFS - FSUN
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
TMP - FSUN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
WSBC - FSUN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
UCB - FSUN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
SBCF - FSUN
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More