BNCDY
Price
$40.00
Change
+$0.43 (+1.09%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.62B
MZHOF
Price
$32.90
Change
-$0.61 (-1.82%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
84.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCDY vs MZHOF

Header iconBNCDY vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts BNCDY vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$40.00
Change+$0.43 (+1.09%)
Volume$15.41K
Capitalization14.62B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$32.90
Change-$0.61 (-1.82%)
Volume$32
Capitalization84.98B
BNCDY vs MZHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNCDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCDY vs. MZHOF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCDY is a StrongBuy and MZHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCDY: $40.00 vs. MZHOF: $32.90)
Brand notoriety: BNCDY and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCDY: 834% vs. MZHOF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BNCDY: $14.62B vs. MZHOF: $84.35B
BNCDY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.62B. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCDY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCDY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNCDY and MZHOF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCDY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MZHOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNCDY is a better buy in the short-term than MZHOF.

Price Growth

BNCDY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($85B) has a higher market cap than BNCDY($14.6B). MZHOF has higher P/E ratio than BNCDY: MZHOF (13.91) vs BNCDY (11.09). BNCDY YTD gains are higher at: 77.319 vs. MZHOF (34.836). BNCDY has less debt than MZHOF: BNCDY (393M) vs MZHOF (22.19T). MZHOF has higher revenues than BNCDY: MZHOF (3.61T) vs BNCDY (2.45B).
BNCDYMZHOFBNCDY / MZHOF
Capitalization14.6B85B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD77.31934.836222%
P/E Ratio11.0913.9180%
Revenue2.45B3.61T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt393M22.19T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCDY vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCDY
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
619
SMR RATING
1..100
121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNCDY's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (73). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

BNCDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (19). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (12). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

BNCDY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (43). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (23). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCDYMZHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONCO3.390.20
+6.27%
Onconetix Inc
AVY160.752.04
+1.29%
Avery Dennison Corp
FPI10.910.11
+1.02%
Farmland Partners
TSE2.48-0.09
-3.50%
Trinseo PLC
VICR48.67-3.47
-6.65%
Vicor Corp

BNCDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNCDY and RSNHF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNCDY and RSNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCDY
1D Price
Change %
BNCDY100%
+1.10%
RSNHF - BNCDY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - BNCDY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDAB - BNCDY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPA - BNCDY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMERF - BNCDY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and HSNGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and HSNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
N/A
HSNGF - MZHOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
BKHPF - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+34.83%
More