BNCDY
Price
$23.73
Change
+$2.29 (+10.68%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
7.2B
CCFC
Price
$12.15
Change
+$1.35 (+12.50%)
Updated
Mar 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.98M
Ad is loading...

BNCDY vs CCFC

Header iconBNCDY vs CCFC Comparison
Open Charts BNCDY vs CCFCBanner chart's image
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$23.73
Change+$2.29 (+10.68%)
Volume$210
Capitalization7.2B
CCSB Financial
Price$12.15
Change+$1.35 (+12.50%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.98M
BNCDY vs CCFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCDY vs. CCFC commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCDY is a Hold and CCFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCDY: $22.96 vs. CCFC: $12.15)
Brand notoriety: BNCDY and CCFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCDY: 100% vs. CCFC: 102%
Market capitalization -- BNCDY: $7.2B vs. CCFC: $12.98M
BNCDY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.2B. CCFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCDY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCFC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCFC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCDY is a better buy in the long-term than CCFC.

Price Growth

BNCDY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCDY($7.2B) has a higher market cap than CCFC($13M). CCFC YTD gains are higher at: 15.166 vs. BNCDY (0.000). CCFC has less debt than BNCDY: CCFC (13.4M) vs BNCDY (375M). BNCDY has higher revenues than CCFC: BNCDY (1.55B) vs CCFC (3.21M).
BNCDYCCFCBNCDY / CCFC
Capitalization7.2B13M55,385%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00015.166-
P/E Ratio11.43N/A-
Revenue1.55B3.21M48,273%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt375M13.4M2,799%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCDY vs CCFC: Fundamental Ratings
BNCDY
CCFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
1192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCFC's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNCDY (93). This means that CCFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

BNCDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCFC (100). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCFC’s over the last 12 months.

BNCDY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCFC (92). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCFC’s over the last 12 months.

CCFC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (49). This means that CCFC’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

BNCDY's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCFC (100). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

CCFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCFC and STBI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCFC and STBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCFC
1D Price
Change %
CCFC100%
N/A
STBI - CCFC
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
ILPMF - CCFC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYBC - CCFC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTFCP - CCFC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
BNCDY - CCFC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More