BN
Price
$64.37
Change
-$0.34 (-0.53%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
99.43B
94 days until earnings call
SEIC
Price
$87.50
Change
+$0.65 (+0.75%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
10.82B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs SEIC

Header iconBN vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts BN vs SEICBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$64.37
Change-$0.34 (-0.53%)
Volume$2.54K
Capitalization99.43B
SEI Investments
Price$87.50
Change+$0.65 (+0.75%)
Volume$407.46K
Capitalization10.82B
BN vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. SEIC commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $64.71 vs. SEIC: $87.50)
Brand notoriety: BN and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 89% vs. SEIC: 44%
Market capitalization -- BN: $99.43B vs. SEIC: $10.82B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $99.43B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than SEIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.95% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($99.4B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($10.8B). BN has higher P/E ratio than SEIC: BN (147.07) vs SEIC (16.45). BN YTD gains are higher at: 13.018 vs. SEIC (6.697). SEIC has less debt than BN: SEIC (29M) vs BN (246B).
BNSEICBN / SEIC
Capitalization99.4B10.8B920%
EBITDAN/A957M-
Gain YTD13.0186.697194%
P/E Ratio147.0716.45894%
RevenueN/A2.21B-
Total CashN/A778M-
Total Debt246B29M848,276%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
BN
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2325
SMR RATING
1..100
9033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (91). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (25). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (90). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (51). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (55). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYNNF0.380.02
+5.37%
Symphony International Holdings Ltd.
RFDA59.810.97
+1.65%
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advtg ETF
CAML37.550.04
+0.11%
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
HART29.13N/A
N/A
NYLI Healthy Hearts ETF
IDU109.91-0.43
-0.39%
iShares US Utilities ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-0.29%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
KKR - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
BX - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
APO - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
+0.75%
TROW - SEIC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
JHG - SEIC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
BN - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
AMG - SEIC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
STT - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More