BN
Price
$45.88
Change
+$1.25 (+2.80%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
103.12B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$12.06
Change
-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.02B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs OWL

Header iconBN vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts BN vs OWLBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$45.88
Change+$1.25 (+2.80%)
Volume$7.54M
Capitalization103.12B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$12.06
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Volume$49.16M
Capitalization8.02B
BN vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. OWL commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BN: $45.88 vs. OWL: $12.06)
Brand notoriety: BN and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 172% vs. OWL: 334%
Market capitalization -- BN: $103.12B vs. OWL: $8.02B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $103.12B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.57% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -16.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($103B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.02B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than BN: OWL (150.75) vs BN (128.64). BN YTD gains are higher at: -0.022 vs. OWL (-19.277). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.7B vs. OWL (780M). OWL has less debt than BN: OWL (3.78B) vs BN (259B). BN has higher revenues than OWL: BN (74.4B) vs OWL (2.75B).
BNOWLBN / OWL
Capitalization103B8.02B1,285%
EBITDA29.7B780M3,808%
Gain YTD-0.022-19.2770%
P/E Ratio128.64150.7585%
Revenue74.4B2.75B2,709%
Total CashN/A137M-
Total Debt259B3.78B6,857%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN: Fundamental Ratings
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEI118.86N/A
N/A
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
KOKU122.81N/A
N/A
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
FTKI19.40-0.08
-0.40%
First Trust Small Cap Buywrite Income ETF
PEZ103.98-0.86
-0.82%
Invesco DW Consumer Cyclicals Momt ETF
SDOW29.39-0.45
-1.51%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+2.80%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+4.88%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CG - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BX - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
SEIC - BN
77%
Closely correlated
+2.15%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-0.41%
KKR - OWL
88%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BX - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
ARES - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
+4.27%
BN - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
BAM - OWL
80%
Closely correlated
+4.88%
More