BN
Price
$67.27
Change
-$0.87 (-1.28%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
62.67B
17 days until earnings call
IVZ
Price
$19.92
Change
+$2.64 (+15.28%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs IVZ

Header iconBN vs IVZ Comparison
Open Charts BN vs IVZBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$67.27
Change-$0.87 (-1.28%)
Volume$1.95M
Capitalization62.67B
Inves
Price$19.92
Change+$2.64 (+15.28%)
Volume$35.67M
Capitalization7.41B
BN vs IVZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. IVZ commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and IVZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $67.27 vs. IVZ: $19.92)
Brand notoriety: BN and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 106% vs. IVZ: 636%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. IVZ: $7.41B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BN and IVZ are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.51% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was +14.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.67% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than IVZ($7.41B). BN has higher P/E ratio than IVZ: BN (67.52) vs IVZ (12.27). BN (17.489) and IVZ (16.809) have similar YTD gains . BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. IVZ (1.13B). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. IVZ (1.93B). IVZ has less debt than BN: IVZ (9.05B) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than IVZ: BN (95.9B) vs IVZ (5.72B).
BNIVZBN / IVZ
Capitalization62.7B7.41B846%
EBITDA30.7B1.13B2,714%
Gain YTD17.48916.809104%
P/E Ratio67.5212.27550%
Revenue95.9B5.72B1,678%
Total Cash16.9B1.93B875%
Total Debt234B9.05B2,587%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
BN
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8346
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1948
SMR RATING
1..100
8882
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
412
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
455
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (51). This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (48). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's SMR Rating (82) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (88). This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (41). This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (55). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OASC26.510.19
+0.71%
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
JPMB38.710.10
+0.26%
JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF
PCN12.560.03
+0.24%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
GOVT22.710.05
+0.22%
iShares US Treasury Bond ETF
GSEP36.970.03
+0.07%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Sep

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+2.25%
BAM - BN
86%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
BX - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
More

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
+15.28%
BN - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
CG - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
JHG - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
APAM - IVZ
77%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
BX - IVZ
77%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
More