BN
Price
$43.79
Change
-$3.10 (-6.61%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.32B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GBLBF
Price
$85.33
Change
-$6.67 (-7.25%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs GBLBF

Header iconBN vs GBLBF Comparison
Open Charts BN vs GBLBFBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$43.79
Change-$3.10 (-6.61%)
Volume$147.25K
Capitalization98.32B
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$85.33
Change-$6.67 (-7.25%)
Volume$300
Capitalization10.54B
BN vs GBLBF Comparison Chart in %
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBLBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. GBLBF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and GBLBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $46.89 vs. GBLBF: $92.00)
Brand notoriety: BN and GBLBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 92% vs. GBLBF: 103%
Market capitalization -- BN: $98.32B vs. GBLBF: $10.54B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $98.32B. GBLBF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBLBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than GBLBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBLBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GBLBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than GBLBF.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.16% price change this week, while GBLBF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($98.3B) has a higher market cap than GBLBF($10.5B). BN has higher P/E ratio than GBLBF: BN (142.76) vs GBLBF (72.89). GBLBF YTD gains are higher at: 35.693 vs. BN (23.453). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. GBLBF (786M). GBLBF has less debt than BN: GBLBF (7.39B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than GBLBF: BN (76.1B) vs GBLBF (6.09B).
BNGBLBFBN / GBLBF
Capitalization98.3B10.5B936%
EBITDA30.3B786M3,855%
Gain YTD23.45335.69366%
P/E Ratio142.7672.89196%
Revenue76.1B6.09B1,250%
Total CashN/A3.37B-
Total Debt251B7.39B3,399%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs GBLBF: Fundamental Ratings
BN
GBLBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1899
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (34) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBLBF (99) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (89) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GBLBF (91) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GBLBF (48) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBLBF (93) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNGBLBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBLBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFIV48.250.43
+0.90%
Dimensional International Value ETF
FDT78.430.69
+0.89%
First Trust Dev Mkts Ex-US AlphaDEX® ETF
MDLV28.170.09
+0.32%
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
FSCS35.710.11
+0.32%
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
OVL53.40-0.17
-0.33%
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.58%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
KKR - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
SEIC - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
APO - BN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
More