BN
Price
$44.46
Change
+$0.44 (+1.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
99.43B
26 days until earnings call
GBLBF
Price
$90.06
Change
+$0.74 (+0.83%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
11.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs GBLBF

Header iconBN vs GBLBF Comparison
Open Charts BN vs GBLBFBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$44.46
Change+$0.44 (+1.00%)
Volume$5.09M
Capitalization99.43B
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$90.06
Change+$0.74 (+0.83%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization11.03B
BN vs GBLBF Comparison Chart in %
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. GBLBF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and GBLBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $44.46 vs. GBLBF: $90.06)
Brand notoriety: BN and GBLBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 141% vs. GBLBF: 162%
Market capitalization -- BN: $99.43B vs. GBLBF: $11.03B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $99.43B. GBLBF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGBLBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than GBLBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBLBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBLBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BN and GBLBF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while GBLBF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($99.4B) has a higher market cap than GBLBF($11B). GBLBF has higher P/E ratio than BN: GBLBF (316.39) vs BN (151.57). GBLBF YTD gains are higher at: 32.832 vs. BN (17.055). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. GBLBF (786M). GBLBF has less debt than BN: GBLBF (7.39B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than GBLBF: BN (76.1B) vs GBLBF (6.09B).
BNGBLBFBN / GBLBF
Capitalization99.4B11B904%
EBITDA30.3B786M3,855%
Gain YTD17.05532.83252%
P/E Ratio151.57316.3948%
Revenue76.1B6.09B1,250%
Total CashN/A3.37B-
Total Debt251B7.39B3,399%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs GBLBF: Fundamental Ratings
BN
GBLBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
9192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
121
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBLBF (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (91) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GBLBF (92) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (50) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (12) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNGBLBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEZ18.400.15
+0.82%
iShares US Oil Equipment & Services ETF
LCAP29.060.15
+0.51%
Principal Capital Appreciation Sel ETF
GSUS92.130.46
+0.50%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF
NXTG107.48-0.02
-0.02%
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
DWSH6.89-0.06
-0.79%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.00%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
JHG - BN
82%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
BX - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
More