BN
Price
$45.88
Change
+$1.25 (+2.80%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
103.12B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EQS
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.05 (-3.70%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs EQS

Header iconBN vs EQS Comparison
Open Charts BN vs EQSBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$45.88
Change+$1.25 (+2.80%)
Volume$7.54M
Capitalization103.12B
Equus Total Return
Price$1.30
Change-$0.05 (-3.70%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization18.86M
BN vs EQS Comparison Chart in %
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. EQS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and EQS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BN: $45.88 vs. EQS: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: BN and EQS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 172% vs. EQS: 15%
Market capitalization -- BN: $103.12B vs. EQS: $18.86M
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $103.12B. EQS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $18.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EQS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than EQS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • EQS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQS is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.57% price change this week, while EQS (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($103B) has a higher market cap than EQS($18.9M). BN has higher P/E ratio than EQS: BN (128.64) vs EQS (1.69). BN YTD gains are higher at: -0.022 vs. EQS (-4.580). EQS has less debt than BN: EQS (1.93M) vs BN (259B). BN has higher revenues than EQS: BN (74.4B) vs EQS (-10.25M).
BNEQSBN / EQS
Capitalization103B18.9M544,974%
EBITDA29.7BN/A-
Gain YTD-0.022-4.5800%
P/E Ratio128.641.697,611%
Revenue74.4B-10.25M-726,208%
Total CashN/A2.48M-
Total Debt259B1.93M13,405,797%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs EQS: Fundamental Ratings
BN
EQS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
805
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24100
SMR RATING
1..100
8897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQS's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (91) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQS’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQS (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than EQS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (88) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EQS (97) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to EQS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EQS (64) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to EQS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EQS (58) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to EQS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNEQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEI118.86N/A
N/A
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
KOKU122.81N/A
N/A
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
FTKI19.40-0.08
-0.40%
First Trust Small Cap Buywrite Income ETF
PEZ103.98-0.86
-0.82%
Invesco DW Consumer Cyclicals Momt ETF
SDOW29.39-0.45
-1.51%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+2.80%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+4.88%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CG - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BX - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
SEIC - BN
77%
Closely correlated
+2.15%
More

EQS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQS has been loosely correlated with OFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQS jumps, then OFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQS
1D Price
Change %
EQS100%
N/A
OFS - EQS
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
BN - EQS
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
ATON - EQS
44%
Loosely correlated
-15.00%
BNBX - EQS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
HSDT - EQS
37%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
More