BN
Price
$61.60
Change
+$0.50 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
62.67B
39 days until earnings call
CNS
Price
$78.11
Change
+$2.34 (+3.09%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs CNS

Header iconBN vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BN vs CNSBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$61.60
Change+$0.50 (+0.82%)
Volume$1.62M
Capitalization62.67B
Cohen & Steers
Price$78.11
Change+$2.34 (+3.09%)
Volume$298.26K
Capitalization3.7B
BN vs CNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. CNS commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Buy and CNS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $61.60 vs. CNS: $78.11)
Brand notoriety: BN and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 84% vs. CNS: 178%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. CNS: $3.7B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than CNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.57% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.85% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than CNS($3.7B). BN has higher P/E ratio than CNS: BN (67.52) vs CNS (28.73). BN YTD gains are higher at: 7.586 vs. CNS (-14.143). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. CNS (184M). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than BN: CNS (140M) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than CNS: BN (95.9B) vs CNS (490M).
BNCNSBN / CNS
Capitalization62.7B3.7B1,695%
EBITDA30.7B184M16,685%
Gain YTD7.586-14.143-54%
P/E Ratio67.5228.73235%
Revenue95.9B490M19,571%
Total Cash16.9B265M6,377%
Total Debt234B140M167,143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs CNS: Fundamental Ratings
BN
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2260
SMR RATING
1..100
8928
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
465
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNS's Valuation (34) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (50). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNS (60). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (89). This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (58). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNS (65). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRO3.220.03
+0.94%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Sec Income Fund
VONG108.500.55
+0.51%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
PHK4.78N/A
N/A
PIMCO High Income Fund
SRHR55.32N/A
N/A
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
XXCH26.62-0.12
-0.45%
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkt Ex Chn Bl 2X

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+0.82%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
BX - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
JHG - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
IVZ - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
STT - BN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+3.09%
APAM - CNS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
BX - CNS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
TROW - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
BN - CNS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
IVZ - CNS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More