BN
Price
$56.09
Change
+$0.60 (+1.08%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
CNS
Price
$92.49
Change
+$1.82 (+2.01%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BN vs CNS

Header iconBN vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BN vs CNSBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$56.09
Change+$0.60 (+1.08%)
Volume$2.87M
CapitalizationN/A
Cohen & Steers
Price$92.49
Change+$1.82 (+2.01%)
Volume$704.35K
CapitalizationN/A
BN vs CNS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. CNS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and CNS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BN: $56.09 vs. CNS: $92.49)
Brand notoriety: BN and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 152% vs. CNS: 305%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. CNS: $3.7B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.28% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than CNS($3.7B). BN has higher P/E ratio than CNS: BN (67.52) vs CNS (28.73). BN YTD gains are higher at: 40.766 vs. CNS (25.732). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. CNS (184M). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than BN: CNS (140M) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than CNS: BN (95.9B) vs CNS (490M).
BNCNSBN / CNS
Capitalization62.7B3.7B1,695%
EBITDA30.7B184M16,685%
Gain YTD40.76625.732158%
P/E Ratio67.5228.73235%
Revenue95.9B490M19,571%
Total Cash16.9B265M6,377%
Total Debt234B140M167,143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs CNS: Fundamental Ratings
BN
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2337
SMR RATING
1..100
8727
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1128
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (71) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (92). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (37). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (87). This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (48). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (28). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.08%
BAM - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
BX - BN
70%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
JHG - BN
68%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
APAM - BN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
TROW - BN
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
More

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+2.01%
APAM - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
BX - CNS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BN - CNS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
VRTS - CNS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
JHG - CNS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
More