BN
Price
$58.93
Change
-$0.91 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.67B
22 days until earnings call
CNS
Price
$86.39
Change
-$2.81 (-3.15%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.7B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

BN vs CNS

Header iconBN vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BN vs CNSBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$58.93
Change-$0.91 (-1.52%)
Volume$7.2K
Capitalization62.67B
Cohen & Steers
Price$86.39
Change-$2.81 (-3.15%)
Volume$4.64K
Capitalization3.7B
BN vs CNS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. CNS commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and CNS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $59.84 vs. CNS: $89.20)
Brand notoriety: BN and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 97% vs. CNS: 128%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. CNS: $3.7B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.03% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

CNS is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.03% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than CNS($3.7B). BN has higher P/E ratio than CNS: BN (67.52) vs CNS (28.73). BN YTD gains are higher at: 4.160 vs. CNS (-3.400). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. CNS (184M). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than BN: CNS (140M) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than CNS: BN (95.9B) vs CNS (490M).
BNCNSBN / CNS
Capitalization62.7B3.7B1,695%
EBITDA30.7B184M16,685%
Gain YTD4.160-3.400-122%
P/E Ratio67.5228.73235%
Revenue95.9B490M19,571%
Total Cash16.9B265M6,377%
Total Debt234B140M167,143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs CNS: Fundamental Ratings
BN
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2137
SMR RATING
1..100
8830
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (92). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (37). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (88). This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (53). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (36). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+2.85%
BAM - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
BX - BN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
JHG - BN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
APAM - BN
67%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
TROW - BN
66%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+1.11%
APAM - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
BN - CNS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
BX - CNS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
VRTS - CNS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
JHG - CNS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
More