BMXI
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
75 days until earnings call
CGLCF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMXI vs CGLCF

Header iconBMXI vs CGLCF Comparison
Open Charts BMXI vs CGLCFBanner chart's image
Brookmount Explorations
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$284.73K
CapitalizationN/A
Cassiar Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$134.02K
CapitalizationN/A
BMXI vs CGLCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMXI vs. CGLCF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMXI is a Hold and CGLCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (BMXI: $0.05 vs. CGLCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: BMXI and CGLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMXI: 58% vs. CGLCF: 97%
Market capitalization -- BMXI: $413.27K vs. CGLCF: $28.8M
BMXI [@Precious Metals] is valued at $413.27K. CGLCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $28.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMXI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCGLCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMXI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CGLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMXI is a better buy in the long-term than CGLCF.

Price Growth

BMXI (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while CGLCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMXI is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.55% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGLCF($28.8M) has a higher market cap than BMXI($413K). BMXI YTD gains are higher at: 29.676 vs. CGLCF (-37.480). BMXI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -318.44K vs. CGLCF (-3.3M). CGLCF has more cash in the bank: 2.25M vs. BMXI (15). BMXI has less debt than CGLCF: BMXI (275) vs CGLCF (108K). BMXI (0) and CGLCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMXICGLCFBMXI / CGLCF
Capitalization413K28.8M1%
EBITDA-318.44K-3.3M10%
Gain YTD29.676-37.480-79%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash152.25M0%
Total Debt275108K0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMXI vs CGLCF: Fundamental Ratings
BMXI
CGLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8714
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5483
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGLCF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as BMXI (60). This means that CGLCF’s stock grew similarly to BMXI’s over the last 12 months.

CGLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BMXI (100). This means that CGLCF’s stock grew similarly to BMXI’s over the last 12 months.

BMXI's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGLCF (93). This means that BMXI’s stock grew significantly faster than CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

BMXI's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CGLCF (83). This means that BMXI’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

BMXI's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGLCF (100). This means that BMXI’s stock grew significantly faster than CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BMXI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMXI and CGLCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMXI and CGLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMXI
1D Price
Change %
BMXI100%
+6.81%
CGLCF - BMXI
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.69%
BOCOF - BMXI
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - BMXI
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
OCGSF - BMXI
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.27%
BKRRF - BMXI
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.80%
More

CGLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGLCF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGLCF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGLCF
1D Price
Change %
CGLCF100%
+5.69%
STLRF - CGLCF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
NSUPF - CGLCF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
APGOF - CGLCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+12.63%
MAUTF - CGLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
DOLLF - CGLCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.41%
More