BMVVF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.04 (-40.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IPX
Price
$43.10
Change
+$0.93 (+2.21%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMVVF vs IPX

Header iconBMVVF vs IPX Comparison
Open Charts BMVVF vs IPXBanner chart's image
Bathurst Metals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.04 (-40.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization2.57M
IperionX
Price$43.10
Change+$0.93 (+2.21%)
Volume$209.41K
Capitalization1.34B
BMVVF vs IPX Comparison Chart in %
BMVVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMVVF vs. IPX commentary
Feb 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMVVF is a Buy and IPX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 07, 2026
Stock price -- (BMVVF: $0.06 vs. IPX: $43.10)
Brand notoriety: BMVVF and IPX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMVVF: 15% vs. IPX: 130%
Market capitalization -- BMVVF: $2.57M vs. IPX: $1.34B
BMVVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.57M. IPX’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMVVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMVVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IPX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMVVF is a better buy in the long-term than IPX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMVVF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMVVF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IPX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMVVF is a better buy in the short-term than IPX.

Price Growth

BMVVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.38% price change this week, while IPX (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +73.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPX is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.67% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPX($1.34B) has a higher market cap than BMVVF($2.57M). IPX YTD gains are higher at: 19.110 vs. BMVVF (6.847). BMVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -322.66K vs. IPX (-27.37M). IPX has more cash in the bank: 77.1M vs. BMVVF (198K). BMVVF has less debt than IPX: BMVVF (50K) vs IPX (4.19M). BMVVF (0) and IPX (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMVVFIPXBMVVF / IPX
Capitalization2.57M1.34B0%
EBITDA-322.66K-27.37M1%
Gain YTD6.84719.11036%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash198K77.1M0%
Total Debt50K4.19M1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMVVFIPX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMVVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEKYX18.460.49
+2.73%
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst3
SUHIX46.530.81
+1.77%
DWS Health and Wellness Inst
CBDYX55.790.66
+1.20%
Columbia Balanced Inst3
MGLRX16.820.15
+0.90%
MFS Global Real Estate R6
GDIIX25.12N/A
N/A
Genter Dividend Income

BMVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMVVF and RCKTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMVVF and RCKTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMVVF
1D Price
Change %
BMVVF100%
N/A
RCKTF - BMVVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
ENCTF - BMVVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - BMVVF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
IPX - BMVVF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
IONR - BMVVF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More

IPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPX has been loosely correlated with VZLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPX jumps, then VZLA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPX
1D Price
Change %
IPX100%
+2.21%
VZLA - IPX
36%
Loosely correlated
+7.23%
LAR - IPX
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.49%
BHP - IPX
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
RIO - IPX
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
USAS - IPX
32%
Poorly correlated
+8.52%
More