BMVVF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.04 (-57.14%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.5M
GTMLF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
117.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMVVF vs GTMLF

Header iconBMVVF vs GTMLF Comparison
Open Charts BMVVF vs GTMLFBanner chart's image
Bathurst Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.04 (-57.14%)
Volume$396
Capitalization1.5M
GREEN TECHNOLOGY METALS
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$52.28K
Capitalization117.71M
BMVVF vs GTMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMVVF vs. GTMLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMVVF is a Hold and GTMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BMVVF: $0.03 vs. GTMLF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: BMVVF and GTMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMVVF: 32% vs. GTMLF: 213%
Market capitalization -- BMVVF: $1.5M vs. GTMLF: $117.71M
BMVVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.5M. GTMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $117.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMVVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMVVF and GTMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMVVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMVVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTMLF is a better buy in the short-term than BMVVF.

Price Growth

BMVVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -31.97% price change this week, while GTMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTMLF($118M) has a higher market cap than BMVVF($1.5M). BMVVF YTD gains are higher at: -31.972 vs. GTMLF (-72.115). BMVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -423.29K vs. GTMLF (-6.21M).
BMVVFGTMLFBMVVF / GTMLF
Capitalization1.5M118M1%
EBITDA-423.29K-6.21M7%
Gain YTD-31.972-72.11544%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash273N/A-
Total Debt105KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMVVFGTMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIVQX12.990.08
+0.62%
MFS Intrinsic Value R4
TMPRX57.830.25
+0.43%
Touchstone Mid Cap R6
SXPCX51.910.20
+0.39%
DWS S&P 500 Index C
CIAOX50.270.17
+0.34%
Capital Advisors Growth Investor
TBWCX20.27-0.13
-0.64%
Thornburg Better World International C

BMVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMVVF and RCKTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMVVF and RCKTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMVVF
1D Price
Change %
BMVVF100%
-57.63%
RCKTF - BMVVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
ENCTF - BMVVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMX - BMVVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
GTMLF - BMVVF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IONR - BMVVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
More

GTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMLF and HRFEF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMLF and HRFEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMLF
1D Price
Change %
GTMLF100%
N/A
HRFEF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSNF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMNF - GTMLF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
MEEEF - GTMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMVVF - GTMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-57.63%
More