CAH | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BMVP | CAH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago44% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago79% | 11 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 5 days ago44% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago51% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IXJ | 91.75 | 0.44 | +0.48% |
iShares Global Healthcare ETF | |||
NMB | 25.52 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
Simplify National Muni Bond ETF | |||
CGO | 11.93 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
Calamos Global Total Return Fund | |||
CAFG | 25.43 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF | |||
ISCF | 40.71 | -0.13 | -0.32% |
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Mltfct ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BMVP and AVGO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMVP and AVGO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMVP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP | 100% | +0.96% | ||
AVGO - BMVP | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
EA - BMVP | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
CHTR - BMVP | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
CAH - BMVP | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
LNG - BMVP | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAH has been loosely correlated with MCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAH jumps, then MCK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAH | 100% | +2.05% | ||
MCK - CAH | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
COR - CAH | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
HSIC - CAH | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
SHTDF - CAH | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.27% | ||
EDAP - CAH | 9% Poorly correlated | -7.44% | ||
More |