BMRRY
Price
$14.79
Change
-$0.39 (-2.57%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.74B
DQJCY
Price
$34.52
Change
+$0.49 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMRRY vs DQJCY

Header iconBMRRY vs DQJCY Comparison
Open Charts BMRRY vs DQJCYBanner chart's image
B&M European Value Retail SA
Price$14.79
Change-$0.39 (-2.57%)
Volume$13.35K
Capitalization3.74B
Pan Pac
Price$34.52
Change+$0.49 (+1.44%)
Volume$21.12K
Capitalization20.46B
BMRRY vs DQJCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMRRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMRRY vs. DQJCY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMRRY is a StrongBuy and DQJCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BMRRY: $14.79 vs. DQJCY: $34.52)
Brand notoriety: BMRRY and DQJCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMRRY: 24% vs. DQJCY: 42%
Market capitalization -- BMRRY: $3.67B vs. DQJCY: $20.46B
BMRRY [@Discount Stores] is valued at $3.67B. DQJCY’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $20.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $776.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $101.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMRRY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDQJCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMRRY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DQJCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DQJCY is a better buy in the long-term than BMRRY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMRRY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQJCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMRRY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DQJCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMRRY is a better buy in the short-term than DQJCY.

Price Growth

BMRRY (@Discount Stores) experienced а +8.45% price change this week, while DQJCY (@Discount Stores) price change was +5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+4.34% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DQJCY($20.5B) has a higher market cap than BMRRY($3.74B). DQJCY has higher P/E ratio than BMRRY: DQJCY (32.42) vs BMRRY (8.49). DQJCY YTD gains are higher at: 27.005 vs. BMRRY (-6.844).
BMRRYDQJCYBMRRY / DQJCY
Capitalization3.74B20.5B18%
EBITDAN/A197B-
Gain YTD-6.84427.005-25%
P/E Ratio8.4932.4226%
RevenueN/A2.18T-
Total CashN/A203B-
Total DebtN/A487B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMRRY vs DQJCY: Fundamental Ratings
BMRRY
DQJCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8032
SMR RATING
1..100
46100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8627
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMRRY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQJCY (95). This means that BMRRY’s stock grew significantly faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMRRY (80). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMRRY’s over the last 12 months.

BMRRY's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (100). This means that BMRRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BMRRY (63). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew similarly to BMRRY’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMRRY (86). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMRRY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRRYDQJCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMRRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABHY19.510.29
+1.52%
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
FTGS33.920.28
+0.83%
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
RIV12.250.09
+0.74%
RiverNorth Opportunities Fund
MVFD25.880.07
+0.26%
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
BBBL47.93-0.13
-0.26%
BondBloxx BBB Rated 10+ Yr Corp Bd ETF

BMRRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMRRY and PSMT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMRRY and PSMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMRRY
1D Price
Change %
BMRRY100%
+0.98%
PSMT - BMRRY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
TGT - BMRRY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
DLMAF - BMRRY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
WMMVF - BMRRY
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
DQJCY - BMRRY
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More

DQJCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQJCY and WMMVY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQJCY and WMMVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQJCY
1D Price
Change %
DQJCY100%
+1.44%
WMMVY - DQJCY
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BMRRY - DQJCY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
WMMVF - DQJCY
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
DLMAF - DQJCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%