BMRPF
Price
$3.46
Change
-$0.17 (-4.68%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
TGT
Price
$95.37
Change
-$3.92 (-3.95%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
43.33B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMRPF vs TGT

Header iconBMRPF vs TGT Comparison
Open Charts BMRPF vs TGTBanner chart's image
B&M European Value Retail SA
Price$3.46
Change-$0.17 (-4.68%)
Volume$16.36K
Capitalization3.57B
Target
Price$95.37
Change-$3.92 (-3.95%)
Volume$7.3M
Capitalization43.33B
BMRPF vs TGT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMRPF vs. TGT commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMRPF is a Hold and TGT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BMRPF: $3.46 vs. TGT: $95.37)
Brand notoriety: BMRPF: Not notable vs. TGT: Notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMRPF: 47% vs. TGT: 98%
Market capitalization -- BMRPF: $3.58B vs. TGT: $43.33B
BMRPF [@Discount Stores] is valued at $3.58B. TGT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $43.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $753.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $99.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMRPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMRPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMRPF and TGT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMRPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMRPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGT is a better buy in the short-term than BMRPF.

Price Growth

BMRPF (@Discount Stores) experienced а -9.28% price change this week, while TGT (@Discount Stores) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-2.09% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGT($43.3B) has a higher market cap than BMRPF($3.57B). TGT has higher P/E ratio than BMRPF: TGT (10.48) vs BMRPF (8.03). BMRPF YTD gains are higher at: -22.758 vs. TGT (-28.035). TGT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.9B vs. BMRPF (835M). TGT has more cash in the bank: 2.89B vs. BMRPF (185M). BMRPF has less debt than TGT: BMRPF (2.34B) vs TGT (19B). TGT has higher revenues than BMRPF: TGT (106B) vs BMRPF (5.58B).
BMRPFTGTBMRPF / TGT
Capitalization3.57B43.3B8%
EBITDA835M8.9B9%
Gain YTD-22.758-28.03581%
P/E Ratio8.0310.4877%
Revenue5.58B106B5%
Total Cash185M2.89B6%
Total Debt2.34B19B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMRPF vs TGT: Fundamental Ratings
BMRPF
TGT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4633
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMRPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as TGT (23) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BMRPF’s stock grew similarly to TGT’s over the last 12 months.

BMRPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TGT (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BMRPF’s stock grew similarly to TGT’s over the last 12 months.

TGT's SMR Rating (33) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BMRPF (46) in the null industry. This means that TGT’s stock grew similarly to BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TGT's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BMRPF (65) in the null industry. This means that TGT’s stock grew similarly to BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TGT's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BMRPF (90) in the null industry. This means that TGT’s stock grew similarly to BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRPFTGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PANW196.27-1.40
-0.71%
Palo Alto Networks Inc
FINV8.70-0.21
-2.36%
FinVolution Group
LPX88.30-2.16
-2.39%
Louisiana-Pacific Corp
RBB16.49-0.66
-3.85%
RBB Bancorp
TOON0.79-0.05
-5.92%
Kartoon Studios

BMRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMRPF and DLTR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMRPF and DLTR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMRPF
1D Price
Change %
BMRPF100%
-4.52%
DLTR - BMRPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
COST - BMRPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
PSMT - BMRPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
TGT - BMRPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.95%
WMT - BMRPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More

TGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGT has been loosely correlated with PSMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGT jumps, then PSMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGT
1D Price
Change %
TGT100%
-3.95%
PSMT - TGT
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
DLTR - TGT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
WMT - TGT
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
OLLI - TGT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
TBBB - TGT
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More