BMRPF
Price
$3.72
Change
+$0.10 (+2.76%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.77B
COST
Price
$987.02
Change
+$4.66 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
437.72B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMRPF vs COST

Header iconBMRPF vs COST Comparison
Open Charts BMRPF vs COSTBanner chart's image
B&M European Value Retail SA
Price$3.72
Change+$0.10 (+2.76%)
Volume$353
Capitalization3.77B
Costco Wholesale
Price$987.02
Change+$4.66 (+0.47%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization437.72B
BMRPF vs COST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMRPF vs. COST commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMRPF is a StrongBuy and COST is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BMRPF: $3.72 vs. COST: $987.02)
Brand notoriety: BMRPF: Not notable vs. COST: Notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMRPF: 0% vs. COST: 54%
Market capitalization -- BMRPF: $3.77B vs. COST: $437.72B
BMRPF [@Discount Stores] is valued at $3.77B. COST’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $437.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $784.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $101.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMRPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCOST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMRPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than BMRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMRPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMRPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than BMRPF.

Price Growth

BMRPF (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while COST (@Discount Stores) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+0.70% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($438B) has a higher market cap than BMRPF($3.77B). COST has higher P/E ratio than BMRPF: COST (55.99) vs BMRPF (8.51). COST YTD gains are higher at: 7.981 vs. BMRPF (-17.001). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.9B vs. BMRPF (835M). COST has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. BMRPF (185M). BMRPF has less debt than COST: BMRPF (2.34B) vs COST (8.18B). COST has higher revenues than BMRPF: COST (269B) vs BMRPF (5.58B).
BMRPFCOSTBMRPF / COST
Capitalization3.77B438B1%
EBITDA835M12.9B6%
Gain YTD-17.0017.981-213%
P/E Ratio8.5155.9915%
Revenue5.58B269B2%
Total Cash185M14.8B1%
Total Debt2.34B8.18B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMRPF vs COST: Fundamental Ratings
BMRPF
COST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
4630
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8451
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMRPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COST (95) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BMRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMRPF (100) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BMRPF (46) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BMRPF (64) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMRPF (84) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRPFCOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEUE6.870.02
+0.29%
NeueHealth
JILL15.480.01
+0.06%
JJill
DDT25.82N/A
N/A
Dillard's Capital Trust I
ARI9.86-0.06
-0.60%
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance
UFPI105.76-0.72
-0.68%
UFP Industries

BMRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMRPF and DLTR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMRPF and DLTR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMRPF
1D Price
Change %
BMRPF100%
N/A
DLTR - BMRPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
COST - BMRPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
PSMT - BMRPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
TGT - BMRPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
WMT - BMRPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
+0.47%
WMT - COST
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
OLLI - COST
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
BJ - COST
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
PSMT - COST
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
DLTR - COST
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More