BMR
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.01 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
42.09M
WONDF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
167.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMR vs WONDF

Header iconBMR vs WONDF Comparison
Open Charts BMR vs WONDFBanner chart's image
Beamr Imaging
Price$2.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.37%)
Volume$10.19M
Capitalization42.09M
Wonderfi Technologies
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$78.46K
Capitalization167.95M
BMR vs WONDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WONDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMR vs. WONDF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMR is a Hold and WONDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BMR: $2.70 vs. WONDF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: BMR and WONDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMR: 1922% vs. WONDF: 31%
Market capitalization -- BMR: $42.09M vs. WONDF: $167.95M
BMR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $42.09M. WONDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $167.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWONDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WONDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WONDF is a better buy in the long-term than BMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WONDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WONDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMR is a better buy in the short-term than WONDF.

Price Growth

BMR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.91% price change this week, while WONDF (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.97% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WONDF($168M) has a higher market cap than BMR($42.1M). WONDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.275 vs. BMR (-45.122). BMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.28M vs. WONDF (-21.14M). WONDF has more cash in the bank: 31.9M vs. BMR (13.9M). BMR has less debt than WONDF: BMR (151K) vs WONDF (2.1M). WONDF has higher revenues than BMR: WONDF (53.6M) vs BMR (3.13M).
BMRWONDFBMR / WONDF
Capitalization42.1M168M25%
EBITDA-4.28M-21.14M20%
Gain YTD-45.12222.275-203%
P/E RatioN/A11.97-
Revenue3.13M53.6M6%
Total Cash13.9M31.9M44%
Total Debt151K2.1M7%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRWONDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WONDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSIX15.230.26
+1.74%
Cullen Small Cap Value I
HLGZX37.030.09
+0.24%
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
RGGRX19.65N/A
N/A
Victory RS Global R6
LAAFX20.38-0.07
-0.34%
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
PUFCX20.78-0.34
-1.61%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services C

BMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with TMICF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then TMICF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMR
1D Price
Change %
BMR100%
+0.37%
TMICF - BMR
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INTZ - BMR
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
REKR - BMR
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
BTDR - BMR
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
SOUN - BMR
37%
Loosely correlated
+7.22%
More

WONDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WONDF and CORZ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WONDF and CORZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WONDF
1D Price
Change %
WONDF100%
+0.27%
CORZ - WONDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMR - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
SANG - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
LQWDF - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
GB - WONDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More