BMR
Price
$3.04
Change
-$0.01 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
47.37M
INTZ
Price
$1.80
Change
-$0.09 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMR vs INTZ

Header iconBMR vs INTZ Comparison
Open Charts BMR vs INTZBanner chart's image
Beamr Imaging
Price$3.04
Change-$0.01 (-0.33%)
Volume$559
Capitalization47.37M
Intrusion
Price$1.80
Change-$0.09 (-4.76%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization37.61M
BMR vs INTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMR vs. INTZ commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMR is a Hold and INTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BMR: $3.05 vs. INTZ: $1.89)
Brand notoriety: BMR and INTZ are both not notable
BMR represents the Packaged Software, while INTZ is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMR: 26% vs. INTZ: 143%
Market capitalization -- BMR: $47.37M vs. INTZ: $37.61M
BMR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $47.37M. INTZ’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $37.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.01B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.06B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTZ is a better buy in the long-term than BMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • INTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BMR and INTZ are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BMR (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.64% price change this week, while INTZ (@Computer Communications) price change was +11.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +150.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+2.16% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMR($47.4M) has a higher market cap than INTZ($37.6M). BMR (-38.008) and INTZ (-38.537) have similar YTD gains . BMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.28M vs. INTZ (-6.28M). BMR has more cash in the bank: 13.9M vs. INTZ (8.44M). BMR has less debt than INTZ: BMR (151K) vs INTZ (1.77M). INTZ has higher revenues than BMR: INTZ (6.83M) vs BMR (3.13M).
BMRINTZBMR / INTZ
Capitalization47.4M37.6M126%
EBITDA-4.28M-6.28M68%
Gain YTD-38.008-38.53799%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.13M6.83M46%
Total Cash13.9M8.44M165%
Total Debt151K1.77M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTZ: Fundamental Ratings
INTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
28

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRINTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDNT77.241.60
+2.12%
RadNet
MELI2494.3533.69
+1.37%
MercadoLibre
LEG9.12-0.05
-0.55%
Leggett & Platt
FOA24.63-0.89
-3.49%
Finance of America Companies
MSW2.83-0.12
-4.07%
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd

BMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with TMICF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then TMICF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMR
1D Price
Change %
BMR100%
-0.65%
TMICF - BMR
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INTZ - BMR
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
REKR - BMR
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
SOUN - BMR
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.27%
BTDR - BMR
37%
Loosely correlated
-7.74%
More

INTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTZ has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTZ jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTZ
1D Price
Change %
INTZ100%
-3.08%
BMR - INTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
REKR - INTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
HUBC - INTZ
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.56%
LPSN - INTZ
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
IDAI - INTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More