BMR
Price
$2.14
Change
-$0.16 (-6.96%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
92.9M
IFBD
Price
$1.47
Change
+$0.04 (+2.80%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.75M
Ad is loading...

BMR vs IFBD

Header iconBMR vs IFBD Comparison
Open Charts BMR vs IFBDBanner chart's image
Beamr Imaging
Price$2.14
Change-$0.16 (-6.96%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization92.9M
Infobird
Price$1.47
Change+$0.04 (+2.80%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization5.75M
BMR vs IFBD Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BMR: $2.30 vs. IFBD: $1.43)
Brand notoriety: BMR and IFBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMR: 121% vs. IFBD: 34%
Market capitalization -- BMR: $92.9M vs. IFBD: $5.75M
BMR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $92.9M. IFBD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFBD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFBD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMR and IFBD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFBD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IFBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BMR and IFBD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BMR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.35% price change this week, while IFBD (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.

IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMR($92.9M) has a higher market cap than IFBD($5.75M). BMR has higher P/E ratio than IFBD: BMR (13.68) vs IFBD (6.69). IFBD YTD gains are higher at: -36.726 vs. BMR (-53.252). BMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -425K vs. IFBD (-14.72M). BMR has more cash in the bank: 6.12M vs. IFBD (3.39K). BMR has less debt than IFBD: BMR (500K) vs IFBD (3.62M). IFBD has higher revenues than BMR: IFBD (5.51M) vs BMR (2.91M).
BMRIFBDBMR / IFBD
Capitalization92.9M5.75M1,616%
EBITDA-425K-14.72M3%
Gain YTD-53.252-36.726145%
P/E Ratio13.686.69204%
Revenue2.91M5.51M53%
Total Cash6.12M3.39K180,413%
Total Debt500K3.62M14%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRIFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

BMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with TMICF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then TMICF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMR
1D Price
Change %
BMR100%
-0.43%
TMICF - BMR
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MARK - BMR
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
INTZ - BMR
41%
Loosely correlated
-13.04%
REKR - BMR
36%
Loosely correlated
-6.60%
VERI - BMR
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.49%
More

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and MRIN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and MRIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
-3.38%
MRIN - IFBD
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.45%
FNCHF - IFBD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - IFBD
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
BMR - IFBD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
ASUR - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
More