BMNM
Price
$1.19
Change
+$0.04 (+3.48%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.98M
MAIN
Price
$66.52
Change
-$0.07 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.95B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMNM vs MAIN

Header iconBMNM vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts BMNM vs MAINBanner chart's image
Bimini Capital Management
Price$1.19
Change+$0.04 (+3.48%)
Volume$163
Capitalization11.98M
Main Street Capital
Price$66.52
Change-$0.07 (-0.11%)
Volume$539.98K
Capitalization5.95B
BMNM vs MAIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMNM vs. MAIN commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMNM is a Hold and MAIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BMNM: $1.19 vs. MAIN: $66.52)
Brand notoriety: BMNM and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMNM: 7% vs. MAIN: 110%
Market capitalization -- BMNM: $11.98M vs. MAIN: $5.95B
BMNM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.98M. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMNM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BMNM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than BMNM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMNM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMNM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than BMNM.

Price Growth

BMNM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.30% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.95B) has a higher market cap than BMNM($12M). BMNM (19.000) and MAIN (18.829) have similar YTD gains . BMNM has less debt than MAIN: BMNM (27.4M) vs MAIN (2.22B). MAIN has higher revenues than BMNM: MAIN (623M) vs BMNM (13.4M).
BMNMMAINBMNM / MAIN
Capitalization12M5.95B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.00018.829101%
P/E RatioN/A10.94-
Revenue13.4M623M2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt27.4M2.22B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMNM vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
BMNM
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
917
SMR RATING
1..100
9516
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMNM (85). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMNM (91). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMNM (95). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (45). This means that BMNM’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (31). This means that BMNM’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMNMMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMVMF0.21N/A
+0.44%
GMV Minerals, Inc.
WONDF0.25N/A
+0.27%
Wonderfi Technologies Inc.
EBCOF15.53N/A
N/A
Ebara Corp.
IOOFF1.30N/A
N/A
Insignia Financial Ltd.
CSTUF11.49N/A
N/A
Constellation Acquisition Corp I

BMNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMNM and TURN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMNM and TURN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMNM
1D Price
Change %
BMNM100%
+3.03%
TURN - BMNM
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
MAIN - BMNM
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
AZIHF - BMNM
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - BMNM
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
AHFCF - BMNM
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-0.11%
ARCC - MAIN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
OBDC - MAIN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
GLAD - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
BXSL - MAIN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
GBDC - MAIN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More