Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMICX vs CBVZX
BMICX vs CBVZX Comparison
Open Charts BMICX vs CBVZX
BlackRock Managed Income Investor C
Price$9.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets871.9M
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.83
Change+$0.09 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.15M
BMICX vs CBVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMICX vs. CBVZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMICX is a Hold and CBVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMICX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. CBVZX (152M). BMICX pays higher dividends than CBVZX: BMICX (4.49) vs CBVZX (3.48). BMICX was incepted earlier than CBVZX: BMICX (9 years) vs CBVZX (15 years). BMICX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.69). BMICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. CBVZX (7.00). BMICX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: BMICX (1000) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. BMICX (7.91). BMICX return over 5 years is better than : 13.67 vs. CBVZX (6.34).
| BMICX | CBVZX | BMICX / CBVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.69 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.69 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.593 | 0.717 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 152M | 574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 3.48 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.91 | 10.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.79 | 23.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.67 | 6.34 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement