Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGCX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv C
Price$19.97
Change-$0.10 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.53B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.71
Change-$0.26 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. BMGCX (6.53B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs BMGCX (0.00). BMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGCX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. BMGCX (-28.40). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.24 vs. BMGCX (-31.87).
| BMGCX | FSMAX | BMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.04 | 5,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -25.762 | 13.303 | -194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.53B | 41B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.40 | 10.55 | -269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.66 | 67.63 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.87 | 26.24 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.45 | 118.30 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers