Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGCX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv C
Price$19.49
Change-$6.98 (-26.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.99B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. BMGCX (5.99B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGCX: FSMAX (0.56) vs BMGCX (0.00). BMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGCX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. BMGCX (-30.71). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. BMGCX (-34.18).
| BMGCX | FSMAX | BMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.04 | 5,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.051 | 3.050 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.99B | 40.6B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.71 | 10.51 | -292% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.01 | 48.06 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.18 | 19.23 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.78 | 157.02 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers