Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGAX vs FSMAX
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGAX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv A
Price$29.36
Change-$7.55 (-20.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.99B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGAX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. BMGAX (5.99B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGAX: FSMAX (0.56) vs BMGAX (0.00). BMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGAX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. BMGAX (-23.40). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. BMGAX (-23.98).
| BMGAX | FSMAX | BMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.102 | 3.050 | 3% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.99B | 40.6B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.40 | 10.51 | -223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.09 | 48.06 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.98 | 19.23 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.76 | 157.02 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement