Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGAX vs FSMAX
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGAX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv A
Price$29.73
Change-$0.99 (-3.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.5B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. BMGAX (6.5B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGAX: FSMAX (0.43) vs BMGAX (0.00). BMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGAX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. BMGAX (-21.59). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. BMGAX (-14.52).
| BMGAX | FSMAX | BMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.157 | 14.415 | -112% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.5B | 41B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.59 | 7.13 | -303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.97 | 61.85 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.52 | 33.85 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.41 | 118.92 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement