BMDPF
Price
$8.38
Change
-$0.24 (-2.78%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
10.77B
SMAL
Price
$55.50
Change
+$0.50 (+0.91%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
64.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs SMAL

Header iconBMDPF vs SMAL Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs SMALBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$8.38
Change-$0.24 (-2.78%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization10.77B
Summit Bancshares
Price$55.50
Change+$0.50 (+0.91%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization64.61M
BMDPF vs SMAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. SMAL commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Hold and SMAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $8.38 vs. SMAL: $55.50)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and SMAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 770% vs. SMAL: 81%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $10.77B vs. SMAL: $64.61M
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.77B. SMAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $64.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than SMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMAL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the short-term than SMAL.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -12.95% price change this week, while SMAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMDPF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than SMAL($64.6M). SMAL has higher P/E ratio than BMDPF: SMAL (14.23) vs BMDPF (5.38). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 38.048 vs. SMAL (26.608). SMAL has less debt than BMDPF: SMAL (3M) vs BMDPF (10.2B).
BMDPFSMALBMDPF / SMAL
Capitalization10.8B64.6M16,718%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.04826.608143%
P/E Ratio5.3814.2338%
Revenue4.23BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.2B3M340,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs SMAL: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
SMAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
982
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
855
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAL (64). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMDPF (100). This means that SMAL’s stock grew significantly faster than BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMAL (82). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BMDPF (50). This means that SMAL’s stock grew similarly to BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAL (55). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFSMAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
11%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCGLF61.400.06
+0.10%
Societe Generale
PGUCY4.50N/A
N/A
Prosegur Cash
AACAF5.79N/A
N/A
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc
BBOE0.62N/A
N/A
Black Box Entertainment Ltd.
PLMJF11.29N/A
N/A
Plum Acquisition Corp. III

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - BMDPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - BMDPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAL and BMDPF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAL and BMDPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAL
1D Price
Change %
SMAL100%
N/A
BMDPF - SMAL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHMG - SMAL
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
BPHLF - SMAL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUTNY - SMAL
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
STBI - SMAL
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More