BMDPF
Price
$8.53
Change
+$0.50 (+6.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
301.01M
SMAL
Price
$55.00
Change
-$0.60 (-1.08%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
9.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs SMAL

Header iconBMDPF vs SMAL Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs SMALBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$8.53
Change+$0.50 (+6.23%)
Volume$808
Capitalization301.01M
Summit Bancshares
Price$55.00
Change-$0.60 (-1.08%)
Volume$10.82K
Capitalization9.75M
BMDPF vs SMAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. SMAL commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a StrongBuy and SMAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $8.53 vs. SMAL: $55.00)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and SMAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 23% vs. SMAL: 690%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $301.01M vs. SMAL: $9.75M
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.01M. SMAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than SMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SMAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the short-term than SMAL.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.44% price change this week, while SMAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMDPF($301M) has a higher market cap than SMAL($9.75M). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 40.593 vs. SMAL (25.468). SMAL has less debt than BMDPF: SMAL (3M) vs BMDPF (9.27B). BMDPF has higher revenues than SMAL: BMDPF (3.14B) vs SMAL (8.15M).
BMDPFSMALBMDPF / SMAL
Capitalization301M9.75M3,087%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.59325.468159%
P/E Ratio2.88N/A-
Revenue3.14B8.15M38,600%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.27B3M309,100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs SMAL: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
SMAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5097
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1659
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMAL (78). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMDPF (100). This means that SMAL’s stock grew significantly faster than BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMAL (79). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BMDPF (46). This means that SMAL’s stock grew similarly to BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAL (59). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFSMAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMCAX66.130.61
+0.93%
Empiric Class A
FDGIX26.120.13
+0.50%
Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth I
TIIRX28.440.13
+0.46%
Nuveen Core Equity A
SACVX35.740.13
+0.37%
Spirit of America Large Cap Value C
VTARX11.290.02
+0.18%
Virtus Tactical Allocation R6

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
+6.32%
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - BMDPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - BMDPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAL and BMDPF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAL and BMDPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAL
1D Price
Change %
SMAL100%
N/A
BMDPF - SMAL
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.32%
CHMG - SMAL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
BPHLF - SMAL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUTNY - SMAL
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
STBI - SMAL
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More