BMDPF
Price
$9.15
Change
-$0.42 (-4.39%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
22.91B
KMERF
Price
$35.55
Change
+$1.70 (+5.02%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs KMERF

Header iconBMDPF vs KMERF Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs KMERFBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$9.15
Change-$0.42 (-4.39%)
Volume$500
Capitalization22.91B
Komercni Banka A.S
Price$35.55
Change+$1.70 (+5.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.31B
BMDPF vs KMERF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. KMERF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Hold and KMERF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $9.15 vs. KMERF: $35.55)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and KMERF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 54% vs. KMERF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $22.91B vs. KMERF: $9.31B
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.91B. KMERF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKMERF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KMERF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than KMERF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.40% price change this week, while KMERF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMDPF($22.9B) has a higher market cap than KMERF($9.31B). KMERF has higher P/E ratio than BMDPF: KMERF (10.27) vs BMDPF (5.83). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 50.807 vs. KMERF (0.000). BMDPF has less debt than KMERF: BMDPF (10.2B) vs KMERF (76.9B). KMERF has higher revenues than BMDPF: KMERF (39.8B) vs BMDPF (4.23B).
BMDPFKMERFBMDPF / KMERF
Capitalization22.9B9.31B246%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.8070.000-
P/E Ratio5.8310.2757%
Revenue4.23B39.8B11%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.2B76.9B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs KMERF: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
KMERF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
742
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as KMERF (11). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to KMERF’s over the last 12 months.

KMERF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMDPF (100). This means that KMERF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

KMERF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BMDPF (9). This means that KMERF’s stock grew similarly to BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as KMERF (57). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to KMERF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMERF (42). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMERF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFKMERF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBL215.845.64
+2.68%
Jabil
DSS1.370.03
+2.62%
DSS
FSBC32.81-0.06
-0.18%
Five Star Bancorp
CHA16.87-0.05
-0.30%
Chagee Holdings Ltd
ILLR0.96-0.09
-8.27%
Triller Group Inc

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
-4.40%
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
KGTFY - BMDPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - BMDPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KMERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMERF and KLIB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMERF and KLIB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMERF
1D Price
Change %
KMERF100%
N/A
KLIB - KMERF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMDPF - KMERF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
CZBC - KMERF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CHCJY - KMERF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - KMERF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More