BMDPF
Price
$8.65
Change
+$0.13 (+1.53%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
301.01M
KGTFY
Price
$13.46
Change
+$0.49 (+3.78%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
8.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs KGTFY

Header iconBMDPF vs KGTFY Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs KGTFYBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$8.65
Change+$0.13 (+1.53%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization301.01M
Krung Thai Bank Public
Price$13.46
Change+$0.49 (+3.78%)
Volume$142
Capitalization8.36B
BMDPF vs KGTFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGTFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. KGTFY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Buy and KGTFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $8.65 vs. KGTFY: $13.46)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and KGTFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 29% vs. KGTFY: 121%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $301.01M vs. KGTFY: $8.36B
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.01M. KGTFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKGTFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KGTFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGTFY is a better buy in the long-term than BMDPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGTFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGTFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGTFY is a better buy in the short-term than BMDPF.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while KGTFY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGTFY($8.36B) has a higher market cap than BMDPF($301M). KGTFY has higher P/E ratio than BMDPF: KGTFY (8.16) vs BMDPF (2.88). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 42.504 vs. KGTFY (27.925). BMDPF has less debt than KGTFY: BMDPF (9.27B) vs KGTFY (154B). KGTFY has higher revenues than BMDPF: KGTFY (130B) vs BMDPF (3.14B).
BMDPFKGTFYBMDPF / KGTFY
Capitalization301M8.36B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.50427.925152%
P/E Ratio2.888.1635%
Revenue3.14B130B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.27B154B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs KGTFY: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
KGTFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as KGTFY (21). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to KGTFY’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMDPF (100). This means that KGTFY’s stock grew significantly faster than BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BMDPF (9). This means that KGTFY’s stock grew similarly to BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as KGTFY (44). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to KGTFY’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGTFY (46). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGTFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFKGTFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGTFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WAMCX31.490.29
+0.93%
Wasatch Ultra Growth
ESCWX11.050.10
+0.91%
Embark Small Cap Equity Institutional
BPTIX204.150.82
+0.40%
Baron Partners Institutional
LKBLX53.950.20
+0.37%
LK Balanced Institutional
CSIRX29.130.06
+0.21%
Columbia Acorn International Sel Inst3

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - BMDPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - BMDPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGTFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGTFY has been loosely correlated with BPHLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGTFY jumps, then BPHLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGTFY
1D Price
Change %
KGTFY100%
N/A
BPHLF - KGTFY
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - KGTFY
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
BGKKF - KGTFY
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MIFF - KGTFY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWPP - KGTFY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More