BMDPF
Price
$8.38
Change
-$0.24 (-2.78%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
10.77B
CZBC
Price
$9.85
Change
-$0.04 (-0.40%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
55.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs CZBC

Header iconBMDPF vs CZBC Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs CZBCBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$8.38
Change-$0.24 (-2.78%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization10.77B
Citizens Ban
Price$9.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
Volume$400
Capitalization55.08M
BMDPF vs CZBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. CZBC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Hold and CZBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $8.38 vs. CZBC: $9.85)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and CZBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 770% vs. CZBC: 28%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $10.77B vs. CZBC: $55.08M
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.77B. CZBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $55.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCZBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CZBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than CZBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CZBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the short-term than CZBC.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -12.95% price change this week, while CZBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMDPF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than CZBC($55.1M). CZBC has higher P/E ratio than BMDPF: CZBC (20.10) vs BMDPF (5.38). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 38.048 vs. CZBC (-2.860). CZBC has less debt than BMDPF: CZBC (100M) vs BMDPF (10.2B). BMDPF has higher revenues than CZBC: BMDPF (4.23B) vs CZBC (29.7M).
BMDPFCZBCBMDPF / CZBC
Capitalization10.8B55.1M19,601%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.048-2.860-1,330%
P/E Ratio5.3820.1027%
Revenue4.23B29.7M14,236%
Total CashN/A20.4M-
Total Debt10.2B100M10,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs CZBC: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
CZBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZBC (63). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CZBC (100). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZBC (79). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CZBC (59). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CZBC (15). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFCZBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
10%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZPHRF0.040.01
+17.18%
ZEPHYR ENERGY PLC.
FSUGY24.700.04
+0.15%
FORTESCUE LTD.
WRRZF0.13N/A
N/A
WALKER RIV RES CORP
GEDSF22.29N/A
N/A
Gedeon Richter Ltd
CLDHF0.58N/A
N/A
Retail China Tr.

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - BMDPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - BMDPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CZBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZBC has been loosely correlated with UNTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZBC jumps, then UNTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZBC
1D Price
Change %
CZBC100%
N/A
UNTN - CZBC
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BMDPF - CZBC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMERF - CZBC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNB - CZBC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
KRNY - CZBC
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
More