BMDPF
Price
$8.65
Change
+$0.13 (+1.53%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
301.01M
CYFL
Price
$45.90
Change
+$2.00 (+4.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs CYFL

Header iconBMDPF vs CYFL Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs CYFLBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$8.65
Change+$0.13 (+1.53%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization301.01M
Century Financial
Price$45.90
Change+$2.00 (+4.56%)
Volume$205
Capitalization46.63M
BMDPF vs CYFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. CYFL commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Buy and CYFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $8.65 vs. CYFL: $45.90)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and CYFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 29% vs. CYFL: 25%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $301.01M vs. CYFL: $46.63M
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.01M. CYFL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $46.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCYFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CYFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMDPF and CYFL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CYFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYFL is a better buy in the short-term than BMDPF.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while CYFL (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMDPF($301M) has a higher market cap than CYFL($46.6M). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 42.504 vs. CYFL (20.832). CYFL has less debt than BMDPF: CYFL (8.52M) vs BMDPF (9.27B). BMDPF has higher revenues than CYFL: BMDPF (3.14B) vs CYFL (14.4M).
BMDPFCYFLBMDPF / CYFL
Capitalization301M46.6M646%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.50420.832204%
P/E Ratio2.88N/A-
Revenue3.14B14.4M21,833%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.27B8.52M108,800%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs CYFL: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
CYFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYFL (67). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

CYFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMDPF (100). This means that CYFL’s stock grew significantly faster than BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYFL (45). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CYFL (46). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CYFL (25). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFCYFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTHCX91.771.37
+1.52%
Fidelity Advisor Technology C
WAMCX31.490.29
+0.93%
Wasatch Ultra Growth
ADNCX18.150.16
+0.89%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov C
SLADX38.800.23
+0.60%
Selected American Shares D
RYBAX72.110.02
+0.03%
Rydex Basic Materials H

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - BMDPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - BMDPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CYFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYFL and BMDPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYFL and BMDPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYFL
1D Price
Change %
CYFL100%
+4.56%
BMDPF - CYFL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CYFL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUY - CYFL
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - CYFL
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
CYSM - CYFL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More