BMCLF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.05 (-17.24%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.09B
DNFGY
Price
$59.35
Change
+$0.60 (+1.02%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
9.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMCLF vs DNFGY

Header iconBMCLF vs DNFGY Comparison
Open Charts BMCLF vs DNFGYBanner chart's image
Baic Mtr
Price$0.24
Change-$0.05 (-17.24%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization2.09B
Dongfeng Motor Group
Price$59.35
Change+$0.60 (+1.02%)
Volume$701
Capitalization9.29B
BMCLF vs DNFGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMCLF vs. DNFGY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCLF is a Hold and DNFGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BMCLF: $0.24 vs. DNFGY: $59.35)
Brand notoriety: BMCLF and DNFGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMCLF: 25% vs. DNFGY: 114%
Market capitalization -- BMCLF: $2.09B vs. DNFGY: $9.29B
BMCLF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.09B. DNFGY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $9.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.13T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $36.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMCLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDNFGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DNFGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNFGY is a better buy in the long-term than BMCLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMCLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNFGY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMCLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DNFGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMCLF is a better buy in the short-term than DNFGY.

Price Growth

BMCLF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -16.96% price change this week, while DNFGY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-3.60% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNFGY($9.29B) has a higher market cap than BMCLF($2.09B). DNFGY has higher P/E ratio than BMCLF: DNFGY (1250.80) vs BMCLF (17.59). DNFGY YTD gains are higher at: 129.239 vs. BMCLF (-21.810).
BMCLFDNFGYBMCLF / DNFGY
Capitalization2.09B9.29B22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.810129.239-17%
P/E Ratio17.591250.801%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMCLF vs DNFGY: Fundamental Ratings
BMCLF
DNFGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
7795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6234
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMCLF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNFGY (99). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than DNFGY’s over the last 12 months.

DNFGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMCLF (100). This means that DNFGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as DNFGY (95). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to DNFGY’s over the last 12 months.

DNFGY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (62). This means that DNFGY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as DNFGY (9). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to DNFGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMCLFDNFGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSS140.871.33
+0.95%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US SmCp ETF
WBIG22.65N/A
-0.02%
WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
QWLD138.19-0.09
-0.07%
SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
HLAL57.19-0.09
-0.16%
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
KHPI25.47-0.07
-0.27%
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF

BMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMCLF and NIU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMCLF and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMCLF
1D Price
Change %
BMCLF100%
N/A
NIU - BMCLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
GELYY - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYMOF - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LI - BMCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
BCCMY - BMCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DNFGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNFGY and NIU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNFGY and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNFGY
1D Price
Change %
DNFGY100%
N/A
NIU - DNFGY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
BYDDY - DNFGY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
BMCLF - DNFGY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYDDF - DNFGY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
MBGAF - DNFGY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More