Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCCX vs RGACX
BMCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BMCCX vs RGACX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv C
Price$17.84
Change-$0.23 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
BMCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. BMCCX (1.46B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BMCCX: RGACX (0.08) vs BMCCX (0.00). BMCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BMCCX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BMCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCCX: RGACX (250) vs BMCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. BMCCX (-12.03). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. BMCCX (21.53).
| BMCCX | RGACX | BMCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.94 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.710 | 4.903 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.03 | 6.70 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.48 | 51.90 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.53 | 46.78 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.43 | 69.68 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement