Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCAX vs RGAHX
BMCAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BMCAX vs RGAHX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv A
Price$24.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
BMCAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BMCAX (1.52B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BMCAX: RGAHX (0.47) vs BMCAX (0.00). BMCAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BMCAX (39 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BMCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCAX: RGAHX (250) vs BMCAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. BMCAX (7.63). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. BMCAX (36.07).
| BMCAX | RGAHX | BMCAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.661 | 13.426 | 50% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.63 | 17.89 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.23 | 58.90 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.07 | 49.57 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.10 | N/A | - |