Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCAX vs RGAGX
BMCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BMCAX vs RGAGX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv A
Price$23.90
Change-$0.31 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
BMCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. BMCAX (1.46B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BMCAX: RGAGX (0.65) vs BMCAX (0.00). BMCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BMCAX (39 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BMCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCAX: RGAGX (250) vs BMCAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. BMCAX (-6.42). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.11 vs. BMCAX (38.13).
| BMCAX | RGAGX | BMCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.30 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.050 | 5.205 | 39% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.42 | 7.67 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.84 | 54.66 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 51.11 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.29 | 75.62 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement