Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCAX vs RGAGX
BMCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BMCAX vs RGAGX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv A
Price$25.75
Change+$0.17 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BMCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BMCAX (1.54B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BMCAX: RGAGX (0.59) vs BMCAX (0.00). BMCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BMCAX (39 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BMCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCAX: RGAGX (250) vs BMCAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. BMCAX (8.39). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. BMCAX (28.12).
| BMCAX | RGAGX | BMCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.30 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.223 | 16.016 | 58% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 18.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.69 | 61.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.12 | 44.13 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.20 | 102.81 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement