BMBOY
Price
$11.11
Change
-$0.59 (-5.04%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
CFOO
Price
$0.77
Change
-$1.73 (-69.20%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMBOY vs CFOO

Header iconBMBOY vs CFOO Comparison
Open Charts BMBOY vs CFOOBanner chart's image
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$11.11
Change-$0.59 (-5.04%)
Volume$1.98K
CapitalizationN/A
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.77
Change-$1.73 (-69.20%)
Volume$2.71K
CapitalizationN/A
BMBOY vs CFOO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBOY vs. CFOO commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBOY is a Hold and CFOO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BMBOY: $11.11 vs. CFOO: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: BMBOY and CFOO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBOY: 70% vs. CFOO: 100%
Market capitalization -- BMBOY: $23.09B vs. CFOO: $50.63M
BMBOY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $23.09B. CFOO’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $50.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBOY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFOO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMBOY is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Price Growth

BMBOY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.48% price change this week, while CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.58% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBOY($23.1B) has a higher market cap than CFOO($50.6M). BMBOY YTD gains are higher at: -45.104 vs. CFOO (-69.200). BMBOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.7B vs. CFOO (-365.58K). BMBOY has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. CFOO (309K). CFOO has less debt than BMBOY: CFOO (7.12K) vs BMBOY (120B). BMBOY has higher revenues than CFOO: BMBOY (408B) vs CFOO (298K).
BMBOYCFOOBMBOY / CFOO
Capitalization23.1B50.6M45,652%
EBITDA71.7B-365.58K-19,612,617%
Gain YTD-45.104-69.20065%
P/E Ratio12.39N/A-
Revenue408B298K136,912,752%
Total Cash7.19B309K2,327,184%
Total Debt120B7.12K1,686,577,653%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMBOY: Fundamental Ratings
BMBOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

BMBOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBOY and GRBMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBOY and GRBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBOY
1D Price
Change %
BMBOY100%
-5.04%
GRBMF - BMBOY
31%
Poorly correlated
-9.15%
ASBFY - BMBOY
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
BRRLY - BMBOY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
BSFC - BMBOY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
CFOO - BMBOY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BFNH have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BFNH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BFNH - CFOO
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CFOO
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
BABB - CFOO
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
BTTR - CFOO
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.72%
BSFC - CFOO
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More