It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRAMP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BMBL (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -16.73% price change this week, while RAMP (@Computer Communications) price change was -17.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.72%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.
BMBL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
RAMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
BMBL | RAMP | BMBL / RAMP | |
Capitalization | 657M | 1.74B | 38% |
EBITDA | -654.68M | 40.2M | -1,629% |
Gain YTD | -22.359 | -12.875 | 174% |
P/E Ratio | 23.09 | 139.26 | 17% |
Revenue | 1.05B | 746M | 141% |
Total Cash | 202M | 421M | 48% |
Total Debt | 628M | 36.3M | 1,730% |
RAMP | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BMBL | RAMP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago72% | 15 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMBL has been loosely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMBL jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BMBL | 100% | -1.71% | ||
FROG - BMBL | 48% Loosely correlated | +12.45% | ||
APPS - BMBL | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.45% | ||
RAMP - BMBL | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
EGHT - BMBL | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
FSLY - BMBL | 42% Loosely correlated | -6.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RAMP has been closely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RAMP jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RAMP | 100% | -4.82% | ||
FROG - RAMP | 67% Closely correlated | +12.45% | ||
EGHT - RAMP | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
FSLY - RAMP | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.30% | ||
FRSH - RAMP | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
GTLB - RAMP | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More |