BMBL
Price
$7.65
Change
-$0.62 (-7.50%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
77 days until earnings call
PMCUF
Price
$163.78
Change
+$3.77 (+2.36%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMBL vs PMCUF

Header iconBMBL vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts BMBL vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Bumble
Price$7.65
Change-$0.62 (-7.50%)
Volume$35.97K
CapitalizationN/A
Pro Medicus
Price$163.78
Change+$3.77 (+2.36%)
Volume$176
CapitalizationN/A
BMBL vs PMCUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBL vs. PMCUF commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBL is a Hold and PMCUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BMBL: $8.27 vs. PMCUF: $163.77)
Brand notoriety: BMBL and PMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBL: 79% vs. PMCUF: 34%
Market capitalization -- BMBL: $1.47B vs. PMCUF: $4.8B
BMBL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.47B. PMCUF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than BMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMBL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BMBL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMBL is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.84% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($4.8B) has a higher market cap than BMBL($1.47B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than BMBL: PMCUF (140.85) vs BMBL (126.58). PMCUF YTD gains are higher at: 152.934 vs. BMBL (-43.894). BMBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 121M vs. PMCUF (78.6M). BMBL has more cash in the bank: 356M vs. PMCUF (90.6M). PMCUF has less debt than BMBL: PMCUF (2.28M) vs BMBL (635M). BMBL has higher revenues than PMCUF: BMBL (1.05B) vs PMCUF (106M).
BMBLPMCUFBMBL / PMCUF
Capitalization1.47B4.8B31%
EBITDA121M78.6M154%
Gain YTD-43.894152.934-29%
P/E Ratio126.58140.8590%
Revenue1.05B106M992%
Total Cash356M90.6M393%
Total Debt635M2.28M27,863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
20
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

BMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMBL has been loosely correlated with EGHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMBL jumps, then EGHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBL
1D Price
Change %
BMBL100%
-1.90%
EGHT - BMBL
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
APPS - BMBL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
RAMP - BMBL
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
FROG - BMBL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
EB - BMBL
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMCUF has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMCUF jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
N/A
BMBL - PMCUF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
OCLCF - PMCUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
DAVA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
VCSA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
More