BMBL
Price
$4.47
Change
+$0.03 (+0.68%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.47B
9 days until earnings call
PMCUF
Price
$118.62
Change
+$2.67 (+2.30%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Ad is loading...

BMBL vs PMCUF

Header iconBMBL vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts BMBL vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Bumble
Price$4.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.68%)
Volume$75.68K
Capitalization1.47B
Pro Medicus
Price$118.62
Change+$2.67 (+2.30%)
Volume$576
Capitalization4.8B
BMBL vs PMCUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBL vs. PMCUF commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBL is a Buy and PMCUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BMBL: $4.44 vs. PMCUF: $118.62)
Brand notoriety: BMBL and PMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBL: 53% vs. PMCUF: 51%
Market capitalization -- BMBL: $1.47B vs. PMCUF: $4.8B
BMBL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.47B. PMCUF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than BMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BMBL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.57% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($4.8B) has a higher market cap than BMBL($1.47B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than BMBL: PMCUF (140.85) vs BMBL (126.58). PMCUF YTD gains are higher at: -23.604 vs. BMBL (-45.455). BMBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 121M vs. PMCUF (78.6M). BMBL has more cash in the bank: 356M vs. PMCUF (90.6M). PMCUF has less debt than BMBL: PMCUF (2.28M) vs BMBL (635M). BMBL has higher revenues than PMCUF: BMBL (1.05B) vs PMCUF (106M).
BMBLPMCUFBMBL / PMCUF
Capitalization1.47B4.8B31%
EBITDA121M78.6M154%
Gain YTD-45.455-23.604193%
P/E Ratio126.58140.8590%
Revenue1.05B106M992%
Total Cash356M90.6M393%
Total Debt635M2.28M27,863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA259.518.77
+3.50%
Tesla
SPY546.6911.27
+2.10%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL208.373.77
+1.84%
Apple
BTC.X93943.800000244.687500
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.08-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp

BMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMBL has been loosely correlated with RAMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMBL jumps, then RAMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBL
1D Price
Change %
BMBL100%
+1.37%
RAMP - BMBL
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
EGHT - BMBL
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.06%
FROG - BMBL
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
APPS - BMBL
48%
Loosely correlated
+8.68%
HCAT - BMBL
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMCUF has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMCUF jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
N/A
BMBL - PMCUF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
OCLCF - PMCUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
DAVA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
VCSA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More