BMBL
Price
$6.70
Change
+$0.24 (+3.72%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
696.87M
60 days until earnings call
PMCUF
Price
$194.76
Change
+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMBL vs PMCUF

Header iconBMBL vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts BMBL vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Bumble
Price$6.70
Change+$0.24 (+3.72%)
Volume$3.9M
Capitalization696.87M
Pro Medicus
Price$194.76
Change+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Volume$35
Capitalization20.4B
BMBL vs PMCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBL vs. PMCUF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBL is a StrongBuy and PMCUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BMBL: $6.70 vs. PMCUF: $194.76)
Brand notoriety: BMBL and PMCUF are both not notable
BMBL represents the Internet Software/Services, while PMCUF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBL: 113% vs. PMCUF: 10%
Market capitalization -- BMBL: $696.87M vs. PMCUF: $20.4B
BMBL [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $696.87M. PMCUF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $20.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.84T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $80.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than BMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the short-term than BMBL.

Price Growth

BMBL (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +8.59% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.10%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMBL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+0.81% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than BMBL($697M). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than BMBL: PMCUF (270.31) vs BMBL (23.09). PMCUF YTD gains are higher at: 25.433 vs. BMBL (-17.690). PMCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. BMBL (-1.07B). BMBL has more cash in the bank: 262M vs. PMCUF (209M). PMCUF has less debt than BMBL: PMCUF (2.26M) vs BMBL (627M). BMBL has higher revenues than PMCUF: BMBL (1.03B) vs PMCUF (213M).
BMBLPMCUFBMBL / PMCUF
Capitalization697M20.4B3%
EBITDA-1.07B165M-647%
Gain YTD-17.69025.433-70%
P/E Ratio23.09270.319%
Revenue1.03B213M484%
Total Cash262M209M125%
Total Debt627M2.26M27,805%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMBLPMCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OASVX13.520.03
+0.22%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Value A
MDCPX27.370.03
+0.11%
BlackRock Balanced Investor A
HGOAX65.510.07
+0.11%
Hartford Growth Opportunities A
RYFNX96.55N/A
N/A
Rydex Financial Services A
WWLAX14.29N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality Value Fund A

BMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMBL has been loosely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMBL jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBL
1D Price
Change %
BMBL100%
+3.72%
FROG - BMBL
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.43%
APPS - BMBL
48%
Loosely correlated
+5.19%
RAMP - BMBL
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
PERI - BMBL
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
EGHT - BMBL
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.08%
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMCUF has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMCUF jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
N/A
BMBL - PMCUF
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.72%
OCLCF - PMCUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-12.27%
DAVA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
FIVN - PMCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More