Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMBCX vs FSMMX
BMBCX vs FSMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMBCX vs. FSMMX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBCX is a Hold and FSMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBCX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FSMMX (1.68B). BMBCX pays higher dividends than FSMMX: BMBCX (3.03) vs FSMMX (2.02). BMBCX was incepted earlier than FSMMX: BMBCX (11 years) vs FSMMX (9 years). FSMMX (1.97) and BMBCX (1.89) have similar cost to investors . FSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 987.00 vs. BMBCX (242.00). BMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMMX: BMBCX (1000) vs FSMMX (2500). FSMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. BMBCX (0.67). FSMMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.17 vs. BMBCX (15.67).
| BMBCX | FSMMX | BMBCX / FSMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.97 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.97 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.597 | 3.881 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 1.68B | 477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.03 | 2.02 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.67 | 3.80 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.48 | 12.48 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.67 | 32.17 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement