Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMBCX vs FASRX
BMBCX vs FASRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMBCX vs. FASRX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBCX is a Hold and FASRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBCX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. FASRX (524M). FASRX pays higher dividends than BMBCX: FASRX (2.74) vs BMBCX (1.27). BMBCX was incepted earlier than FASRX: BMBCX (11 years) vs FASRX (12 years). FASRX (2.40) is less costly to investors than BMBCX (1.89). FASRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BMBCX (242.00). BMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASRX: BMBCX (1000) vs FASRX (1000000). FASRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. BMBCX (3.28). BMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.92 vs. FASRX (3.02).
| BMBCX | FASRX | BMBCX / FASRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.18 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.071 | 1.799 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.2B | 524M | 1,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.74 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 5.00 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | 14.68 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.92 | 3.02 | 527% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.45 | 29.10 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers