BMA
Price
$71.69
Change
+$1.95 (+2.80%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.14B
24 days until earnings call
SWZNF
Price
$4100.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
528.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMA vs SWZNF

Header iconBMA vs SWZNF Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs SWZNFBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$71.69
Change+$1.95 (+2.80%)
Volume$573.15K
Capitalization3.14B
Schweizerische Nationalbank
Price$4100.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3
Capitalization528.79M
BMA vs SWZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. SWZNF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a StrongBuy and SWZNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BMA: $71.69 vs. SWZNF: $4100.00)
Brand notoriety: BMA and SWZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 167% vs. SWZNF: 175%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $3.14B vs. SWZNF: $528.79M
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.14B. SWZNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $528.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSWZNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SWZNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the long-term than SWZNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWZNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWZNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the short-term than SWZNF.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.08% price change this week, while SWZNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMA($3.14B) has a higher market cap than SWZNF($529M). BMA has higher P/E ratio than SWZNF: BMA (89.76) vs SWZNF (0.03). SWZNF YTD gains are higher at: 15.905 vs. BMA (-25.456). BMA has higher revenues than SWZNF: BMA (573B) vs SWZNF (-72.38B).
BMASWZNFBMA / SWZNF
Capitalization3.14B529M594%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-25.45615.905-160%
P/E Ratio89.760.03307,591%
Revenue573B-72.38B-792%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A104B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs SWZNF: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
SWZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
366
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWZNF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SWZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWZNF (100) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SWZNF (11) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWZNF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BMA (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWZNF (66) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMASWZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWAAX40.900.23
+0.57%
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps A
IVCSX13.640.07
+0.52%
Voya Small Company Port I
SPFFX30.030.12
+0.40%
Sphere 500 Climate Fund
VMVLX264.440.88
+0.33%
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Instl
PGRNX25.600.07
+0.27%
Impax Global Environmental Markets Inv

BMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMA
1D Price
Change %
BMA100%
+2.80%
GGAL - BMA
92%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
SUPV - BMA
91%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
BBAR - BMA
91%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
BAP - BMA
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
DB - BMA
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More

SWZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWZNF has been loosely correlated with IBWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWZNF jumps, then IBWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWZNF
1D Price
Change %
SWZNF100%
N/A
IBWC - SWZNF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TVLF - SWZNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTBRY - SWZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
BMA - SWZNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
TDCB - SWZNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More