BMA
Price
$96.70
Change
+$1.46 (+1.53%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
58 days until earnings call
NWFL
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.52 (-1.86%)
Updated
Dec 23, 10:38 AM (EDT)
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BMA vs NWFL

Header iconBMA vs NWFL Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs NWFLBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$96.70
Change+$1.46 (+1.53%)
Volume$264.96K
CapitalizationN/A
Norwood Financial
Price$27.50
Change-$0.52 (-1.86%)
Volume$230
CapitalizationN/A
BMA vs NWFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. NWFL commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a Hold and NWFL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BMA: $96.70 vs. NWFL: $28.02)
Brand notoriety: BMA and NWFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 84% vs. NWFL: 652%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $3.14B vs. NWFL: $220.68M
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.14B. NWFL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $220.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the long-term than NWFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the short-term than NWFL.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while NWFL (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

NWFL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMA($3.14B) has a higher market cap than NWFL($221M). BMA has higher P/E ratio than NWFL: BMA (89.76) vs NWFL (13.77). BMA YTD gains are higher at: 277.553 vs. NWFL (-11.014). BMA has higher revenues than NWFL: BMA (573B) vs NWFL (70.2M).
BMANWFLBMA / NWFL
Capitalization3.14B221M1,422%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD277.553-11.014-2,520%
P/E Ratio89.7613.77652%
Revenue573B70.2M816,239%
Total CashN/A30.1M-
Total DebtN/A144M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs NWFL: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
NWFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWFL's Valuation (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (74). This means that NWFL’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWFL (100). This means that BMA’s stock grew significantly faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (48). This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (55). This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

NWFL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (100). This means that NWFL’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMANWFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMA
1D Price
Change %
BMA100%
+1.53%
GGAL - BMA
88%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
BBAR - BMA
87%
Closely correlated
+8.41%
SUPV - BMA
45%
Loosely correlated
+6.28%
CIB - BMA
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
NWFL - BMA
29%
Poorly correlated
+11.28%
More

NWFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWFL has been loosely correlated with FNLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWFL jumps, then FNLC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWFL
1D Price
Change %
NWFL100%
+11.28%
FNLC - NWFL
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.61%
FDBC - NWFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+5.44%
SFBS - NWFL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
HTH - NWFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
CCBG - NWFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More