BMA
Price
$45.34
Change
-$1.97 (-4.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
53 days until earnings call
FSDK
Price
$63.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMA vs FSDK

Header iconBMA vs FSDK Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs FSDKBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$45.34
Change-$1.97 (-4.16%)
Volume$668.25K
Capitalization3.1B
First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky (The) (OH)
Price$63.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$245
CapitalizationN/A
BMA vs FSDK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSDK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. FSDK commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a Hold and FSDK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BMA: $45.34 vs. FSDK: $63.00)
Brand notoriety: BMA and FSDK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 110% vs. FSDK: 78%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $3.1B vs. FSDK: $0
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.1B. FSDK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSDK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSDK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the long-term than FSDK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSDK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSDK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the short-term than FSDK.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +15.46% price change this week, while FSDK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDK YTD gains are higher at: 0.018 vs. BMA (-52.173).
BMAFSDKBMA / FSDK
Capitalization3.1BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-52.1730.018-289,868%
P/E Ratio10.22N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs FSDK: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
FSDK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6648
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
1100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSDK's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMA (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSDK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSDK (100) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSDK (100) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew significantly faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

FSDK's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMA (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSDK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSDK (100) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMAFSDK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSDK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEVDX12.820.17
+1.34%
Driehaus Event Driven
PMPCX16.250.10
+0.62%
Putnam Sustainable Future C
AFDCX54.020.33
+0.61%
American Century Large Cap Equity C
TRHZX174.651.02
+0.59%
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Z
SPMGX8.22N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha R

BMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMA
1D Price
Change %
BMA100%
-4.16%
GGAL - BMA
94%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
SUPV - BMA
94%
Closely correlated
-7.22%
BBAR - BMA
93%
Closely correlated
-4.54%
BSAC - BMA
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
BAP - BMA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

FSDK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSDK and CBWA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSDK and CBWA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSDK
1D Price
Change %
FSDK100%
N/A
CBWA - FSDK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
BKHYY - FSDK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
FSRL - FSDK
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
BMA - FSDK
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
HONT - FSDK
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
More