BLZE
Price
$9.27
Change
+$0.15 (+1.64%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
513.81M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
ENADF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.07 (+4.64%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
159.4M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLZE vs ENADF

Header iconBLZE vs ENADF Comparison
Open Charts BLZE vs ENADFBanner chart's image
Backblaze
Price$9.27
Change+$0.15 (+1.64%)
Volume$200
Capitalization513.81M
Enad Global 7 AB
Price$1.57
Change+$0.07 (+4.64%)
Volume$8.4K
Capitalization159.4M
BLZE vs ENADF Comparison Chart in %
BLZE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLZE vs. ENADF commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLZE is a Hold and ENADF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BLZE: $9.12 vs. ENADF: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: BLZE and ENADF are both not notable
BLZE represents the Computer Communications, while ENADF is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLZE: 61% vs. ENADF: 316%
Market capitalization -- BLZE: $513.81M vs. ENADF: $159.4M
BLZE [@Computer Communications] is valued at $513.81M. ENADF’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $159.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $13.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLZE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENADF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLZE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ENADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLZE and ENADF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLZE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENADF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLZE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ENADF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENADF is a better buy in the short-term than BLZE.

Price Growth

BLZE (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while ENADF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLZE is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.91% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Electronics/Appliances (-3.14% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLZE($514M) has a higher market cap than ENADF($159M). BLZE YTD gains are higher at: 51.495 vs. ENADF (34.615). ENADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. BLZE (-12.27M). ENADF has more cash in the bank: 454M vs. BLZE (50.5M). BLZE has less debt than ENADF: BLZE (61.6M) vs ENADF (389M). ENADF has higher revenues than BLZE: ENADF (1.96B) vs BLZE (137M).
BLZEENADFBLZE / ENADF
Capitalization514M159M323%
EBITDA-12.27M418M-3%
Gain YTD51.49534.615149%
P/E RatioN/A288.35-
Revenue137M1.96B7%
Total Cash50.5M454M11%
Total Debt61.6M389M16%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLZEENADF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLZE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMCLX15.270.12
+0.79%
Harbor Mid Cap Institutional
SHSAX62.290.27
+0.44%
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Inv A
FCUPX20.710.09
+0.44%
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class P
UBPIX16.63-0.06
-0.36%
ProFunds UltraLatin America Inv
AGRYX145.72-1.40
-0.95%
AB Growth Advisor

BLZE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLZE has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLZE jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLZE
1D Price
Change %
BLZE100%
-3.39%
EVCM - BLZE
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
SPT - BLZE
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
JAMF - BLZE
50%
Loosely correlated
-6.28%
AMPL - BLZE
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
AFRM - BLZE
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

ENADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENADF and CRM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENADF and CRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENADF
1D Price
Change %
ENADF100%
N/A
CRM - ENADF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
GXAI - ENADF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
BLZE - ENADF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
GENTF - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOST - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
More