Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLYCX vs GFAFX
BLYCX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BLYCX vs GFAFX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth C
Price$33.13
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.41M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BLYCX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLYCX vs. GFAFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLYCX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BLYCX (202M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BLYCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs BLYCX (0.00). BLYCX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BLYCX (10 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BLYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLYCX: GFAFX (250) vs BLYCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. BLYCX (-3.09). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. BLYCX (-10.03).
| BLYCX | GFAFX | BLYCX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.67 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.67 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.226 | 18.872 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.09 | 6.96 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.61 | 61.66 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.03 | 31.86 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement