Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLYCX vs GFAFX
BLYCX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BLYCX vs GFAFX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth C
Price$32.84
Change-$0.65 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.13M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
BLYCX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLYCX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLYCX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BLYCX (202M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BLYCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs BLYCX (0.00). BLYCX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BLYCX (10 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BLYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLYCX: GFAFX (250) vs BLYCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. BLYCX (-1.38). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. BLYCX (-4.72).
| BLYCX | GFAFX | BLYCX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.67 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.67 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.221 | 19.672 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.38 | 8.83 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.29 | 64.95 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.72 | 40.08 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement